Skip to main content

Security report for averoachmea.nl

Avéro Achmea · Finance · Netherlands

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avéro Achmea is a well-established Dutch insurance provider specializing in offering insurance solutions through independent advisors to entrepreneurs, employers, and self-employed individuals. As a subsidiary of Achmea, it holds a strong market position in the finance sector, providing a broad range of insurance products including damage, income, and agricultural insurances, complemented by prevention services and direct customer support portals. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content tailored to its target audience in the Netherlands. Technically, the site employs a modern technology stack with extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools, though it lacks a valid SSL certificate which is a critical security concern. Security headers and policies are well implemented, but the absence of proper HTTPS undermines the overall security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, enhancing user trust. Overall, the site is functional and credible but requires urgent remediation of SSL issues to improve security and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching averoachmea.nl

This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
100
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention averoachmea.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
121
Employees
0
Customers
121
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
3%

13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for averoachmea.nl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Avéro Achmea operates in the Dutch insurance market with a mature domain and consistent registration details. Its business model leverages independent advisors to deliver tailored insurance products to a diverse client base including SMEs and large enterprises. The company benefits from its affiliation with Achmea, a major cooperative insurer, which strengthens its market credibility. The website's extensive integration with marketing and analytics platforms indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and retention. The presence of multiple login portals and direct service links suggests a focus on customer self-service and operational efficiency. The lack of phone contact details on the site may indicate a preference for digital communication channels. The company maintains a clear partnership ecosystem and transparent policies, supporting its growth and compliance strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with strong implementation of security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS headers. Cookies are set with secure and HttpOnly flags, and SameSite policies are enforced. However, the critical absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support severely compromise the security posture, exposing users to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, and no WAF or blocking mechanisms are in place. The site lacks explicit incident response or security policy disclosures, which could be improved to enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, while some best practices are followed, the SSL deficiency is a major risk that must be addressed promptly.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure all communications.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable legacy insecure protocols.
  3. Configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate validation performance and security.
  5. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Avéro Achmea
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET technology and leverages a variety of modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services including Google Analytics, HubSpot, Hotjar, and ContentSquare for analytics and marketing. It uses Amazon CloudFront CDN and likely Microsoft Azure hosting infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is enhanced through structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags. Performance metrics were not available, but the use of CDNs and optimized images suggests moderate to good performance. The site uses a complex Content Security Policy to restrict resource loading to trusted domains, enhancing security. However, the invalid SSL certificate and lack of TLS support represent significant technical debt and risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with averoachmea.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review averoachmea.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.