Skip to main content

Security report for avenirgroup.cz

Avenir Financial Group · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avenir Financial Group is a Czech Republic based financial advisory company with over 20 years of experience among its founders. The company offers a comprehensive range of financial services including insurance, investment, real estate, mortgage advisory, and vehicle financing. Their business model focuses on providing clients with access to a broad portfolio of vetted financial institutions and products, emphasizing fair and quality service. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery, featuring a cookie consent mechanism and Google Analytics integration with IP anonymization. Contact information and partner affiliations are clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust evaluation. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, targeting clients seeking financial and insurance services in the Czech market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avenirgroup.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted financial advisor with a broad service portfolio targeting both individual and corporate clients. Their partnerships with major financial institutions and insurance providers strengthen their market position. The inclusion of an interactive advisor map and client zone indicates a focus on customer engagement and service accessibility. Affiliate marketing through direct.cz and related insurance platforms suggests diversified revenue streams. The company maintains a medium-sized operation with consistent branding and quality content. Strategic partnerships and subsidiary brands like Avenir Gold Invest expand their service offerings. The business intelligence points to a stable, client-focused financial services provider with growth potential in the Czech Republic.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent with opt-in mechanisms, demonstrating awareness of privacy and security best practices. Google Analytics is configured with anonymized IP tracking, reducing privacy risks. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency. The WHOIS data is missing, which could be a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is up to date and strong by performing regular security scans.
  5. Improve accessibility features and conduct audits to enhance user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Avenir Financial Group
Registration number
05776392
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Avenir Financial Group
Description
Společnost Avenir Financial Group svůj poradenský model zaměřuje na kvalitu služby a zájmy klienta. Základní sdílenou hodnotou společnosti je férový přístup ke klientům i spolupracovníkům. Avenir nabízí svým klientům komplexní přístup postavený na maximálním množství prověřených finančních institucí a jejich produktů.
Key services
Majetkové poradenství, Hypoteční poradenství a servis, Realitní servis, Investice, Pojištění, Financování vozidel, Služby pro firemní klienty
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Google Analytics, N3tCookieConsentManager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/opt-out
  • Anonymized Google Analytics IP tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Strong focus on financial advisory, insurance, real estate, and investment services
  3. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented in Czech language
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. Multiple external partner and affiliate links present
  7. Website uses Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery
  8. Google Analytics used with IP anonymization
  9. Contact information clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, providing a responsive and structured user interface. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics, with privacy-conscious configurations. The site includes interactive elements such as an advisor search form and an SVG map for regional navigation. Performance appears moderate with standard web technologies. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information or advanced technical security configurations visible. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and enhance security and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avenirgroup.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avenirgroup.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.