Avantūras zeme is a Latvian hospitality and adventure tourism website utilizing WordPress with WooCommerce and the MotoPress Hotel Booking plugin to facilitate online bookings. The site targets Latvian-speaking customers interested in adventure and hospitality services. The technical infrastructure is based on a modern CMS with common plugins, providing a moderate level of performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of contact information and WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify business legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and business transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention avanturaszeme.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for avanturaszeme.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on adventure tourism services in Latvia. The use of a hotel booking plugin indicates a direct-to-consumer online booking model. The website's market positioning appears to be small-scale, targeting local or regional customers. There is no evidence of parent companies or subsidiaries. The lack of detailed business information and contact data suggests a need for better transparency to improve credibility and customer confidence. The partnership with MotoPress for booking technology is a positive indicator of leveraging established service providers.
Security posture
The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also raises compliance concerns, particularly under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided content, but the missing security best practices warrant attention.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Establish and display a security incident response policy and contact channels for reporting security issues.
Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
The website appears to be related to hospitality or adventure tourism, indicated by the use of a hotel booking plugin and Latvian language content. No explicit business description is found in the provided content.
Key services
Hotel booking, Adventure tourism services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, MotoPress Hotel Booking plugin, jQuery, Astra Theme, Google Fonts, Klix Pay Later Widget
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor
Security
Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Marketing tools
Klix Pay Later Widget
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website uses WordPress with Astra theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality.
Hotel Booking plugin by MotoPress is used, indicating hospitality service offerings.
No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the provided HTML snippet.
No security headers detected in the provided data, which is a security concern.
HTTPS is enabled, indicating basic security best practice.
No signs of adult or explicit content; content is safe for general audiences.
No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content is accessible.
Limited WHOIS data due to query limit error; registrant information is unavailable.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, supplemented by the MotoPress Hotel Booking plugin for hospitality services. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts, and integrates a Klix Pay Later widget for payment options. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization detected. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal, with meta tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with avanturaszeme.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avanturaszeme.lv.