Skip to main content

Security report for avantfunds.cz

AVANT investiční společnost, a.s. · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AVANT investiční společnost, a.s. is a Czech investment company specializing in the establishment, management, and administration of funds for qualified investors. Positioned as a market leader in the Czech Republic, the company offers a broad portfolio of investment opportunities tailored to qualified investors, including asset management, investment advisory, and fund structuring services. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy brand image with clear communication of services and company credentials. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, complemented by a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance, supporting a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent management but lacks explicit security headers and publicly available security policies or incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the professional presentation and compliance measures mitigate concerns. Overall, AVANT's digital presence is solid, with room for improvement in security header implementation and transparency around security policies. The company should consider publishing incident response information and conducting regular security audits to enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avantfunds.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention avantfunds.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
17%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for avantfunds.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AVANT operates in the finance sector, focusing on qualified investor funds, a niche with high regulatory and compliance requirements. Their market position as a leader in this segment is supported by a diverse fund offering and long-standing experience. Revenue streams likely derive from fund management fees, advisory services, and fund administration. The target audience includes institutional and professional investors seeking diversified investment products. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and compliance documentation, indicating a mature business model. Partnerships with service providers like UNIFER and use of LinkedIn for corporate presence suggest a well-integrated ecosystem. Growth indicators include a broad fund portfolio and active marketing of new funds. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining regulatory compliance and digital trust to sustain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data was found. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is managed through consent, mitigating privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced header implementation, regular security audits, and public disclosure of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments, especially for third-party scripts and plugins.
  4. Ensure all web forms have anti-CSRF tokens and robust input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Maintain up-to-date software and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AVANT investiční společnost, a.s.
VAT number
CZ 275 90 241
Registration number
IČO 275 90 241
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AVANT investiční společnost, a.s.
Description
Jsme česká investiční společnost, která se specializuje na zakládání, správu a administraci fondů kvalifikovaných investorů.
Key services
Investment advisory, Fund structuring, Fund administration, Asset management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Dynamic Cookies Bar Pro, Yoast SEO, Font Awesome, Slick Carousel, jQuery Fancybox, jQuery Modal
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust analysis.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with detailed consent management.
  4. Professional finance sector website targeting qualified investors.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. Clear contact information and company details provided.
  7. No security policy or incident response info publicly available.
  8. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and widely supported technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and several UI libraries like Slick Carousel and Fancybox. The site uses a cookie consent plugin (Dynamic Cookies Bar Pro) to manage user privacy preferences effectively. Performance is moderate with some optimizations such as font and image preloading. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The site lacks explicit hosting provider information but uses standard CDN and analytics services. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require monitoring for security and performance impacts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avantfunds.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avantfunds.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.