Skip to main content

Security report for av-studio.si

AV studio d.o.o. · Media · Slovenia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AV studio d.o.o. is a well-established Slovenian creative agency specializing in marketing, branding, digital campaigns, and multimedia production. With over 40 years of experience, the company serves a diverse client base ranging from small to large businesses, emphasizing innovation, creativity, and strong client relationships. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses seeking comprehensive marketing solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Visual Composer, Google Tag Manager, and multiple analytics platforms, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with detailed cookie policies and consent management. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data support the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching av-studio.si

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in Slovenia's media and marketing sector, leveraging a broad service portfolio including digital strategies, content marketing, and production services. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored marketing experiences. The presence of subdomains for academy and news services indicates diversification and engagement with clients beyond traditional agency roles. Social media integration and transparent contact information enhance customer engagement and trust. The company appears to maintain a stable growth trajectory with a clear focus on innovation and client partnerships.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, reflecting awareness of privacy and security regulations such as GDPR. Multiple analytics tools are used with user consent, balancing data collection and privacy. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a public security policy or incident response contact is a minor gap in transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  4. Ensure all forms include anti-CSRF tokens and robust input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Continue enhancing privacy compliance by maintaining up-to-date cookie policies and user consent mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AV studio d.o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AV studio d.o.o.
Description
AV studio is a creative agency with a heart, offering a wide range of marketing and communication services including digital strategies, campaigns, branding, media buying, content marketing, and production services. They emphasize innovation, creativity, and strong client relationships.
Key services
Digital strategies, Digital campaigns, Online media buying, Websites and applications, Content marketing, Social media management, SEO optimization, CRM and email marketing, Graphic design, Print materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Visual Composer, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Matomo, CookieYes Consent Management, Three.js (3D rendering), Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Visual Composer
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Matomo with consent settings

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo, Hotjar, Simple Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads (implied via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Matomo
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Matomo, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. Multiple analytics and tracking tools used with consent management.
  4. Clear contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  5. Professional design and consistent branding.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-standing domain ownership.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Visual Composer for page building, supported by jQuery and Three.js for interactive and 3D content. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Matomo, and CookieYes for analytics and consent management, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses multiple external domains for fonts, analytics, and social media integration. Overall, the technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with opportunities to improve security headers and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with av-studio.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review av-studio.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.