Skip to main content

Security report for aurora-experience.com

Aurora Colapis · Hospitality · Croatia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aurora Colapis operates the Aurora River Experience, offering unique cultural and historic river boat tours on the traditional Žitna lađa Zora in Croatia. The business targets tourists and local groups seeking authentic river experiences, team building events, and private parties. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, integrating booking and e-commerce functionalities. The technical infrastructure is modern and includes Google Analytics and Ads for marketing and tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers. Privacy compliance is good with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the business presents a trustworthy and niche tourism offering with solid digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aurora-experience.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a niche tourism provider specializing in historic river boat experiences. Its business model revolves around experiential tourism and event hosting, leveraging cultural heritage. The website reflects a small-sized enterprise founded in 2021, supported by EU funding. The partnership ecosystem includes regional tourism boards and EU structural funds. The company uses social media actively for marketing and customer engagement. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, private rentals, and event bookings. Growth potential exists in expanding event offerings and digital marketing. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, relying on forms and social media for communication.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are missing, which could expose the site to certain web attacks. No security policy or incident response contact information is published, limiting transparency in security management. The WordPress platform and plugins should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved with better DNS security and HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to patch known vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential weaknesses.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aurora Colapis
Description
Aurora Colapis offers unique river boat experiences on the historic Žitna lađa Zora, a traditional 18th-century river boat, providing tours, team building, private rentals, and boat parties on the Kupa river in Croatia.
Key services
Lađarski izlet (boat tours), Team building and private rentals, Boat parties with live DJ
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.7, WooCommerce 6.5.1, Elementor, Revolution Slider, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Contact Form 7, Booking Calendar Pro Payment, TRX Addons
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based tourism business site with booking and e-commerce features.
  2. Content is primarily in Croatian with English alternate language available.
  3. Uses multiple third-party plugins for booking, forms, and sliders.
  4. Includes EU funding acknowledgments indicating legitimate funding sources.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content; contact primarily via forms and social media.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce and Elementor for page building. It uses popular plugins such as Revolution Slider and Booking Calendar Pro Payment. The site loads multiple external resources including Google Fonts, YouTube APIs, and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider assets but overall responsive design is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting is provided by COREhub, S.R.L., with domain registration consistent with business age. No major technical debt detected but security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aurora-experience.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aurora-experience.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.