Skip to main content

Security report for auralight.com

Aura Light International AB · Energy · Sweden

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aura Light International AB is a well-established company specializing in sustainable and energy-efficient lighting solutions for professional environments such as public spaces, industry, and retail. The company offers a broad range of products including luminaires, light sources, and smart lighting control systems, positioning itself as a leading player in the Nordic and international markets. The website reflects a professional B2B business model with clear product segmentation and customer engagement channels. Technically, the website is built on the Litium e-commerce platform with integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, although performance metrics are not available. Hosting appears to be via Fastly CDN with Varnish caching. From a security perspective, the site lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability impacting user trust and data security. Security headers are partially implemented, but modern TLS protocols are disabled. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Contact information is readily available, but no explicit security policy or incident response details are found. Overall, Aura Light's website demonstrates solid business credibility and content quality but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration to enhance security posture and user trust. Strategic recommendations include installing a valid SSL certificate, enabling modern TLS protocols, and publishing incident response contacts to strengthen security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching auralight.com

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention auralight.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
1
Customers
5
Third parties
6
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for auralight.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.auralight.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aura Light International AB operates in the energy sector focusing on sustainable lighting solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its long history since 1930, comprehensive product portfolio, and emphasis on sustainability and smart lighting technologies. The business model targets professional B2B customers in public, industrial, and retail sectors. Revenue streams likely include product sales and consulting services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem evidenced by integrations and social media presence. Growth indicators include sustainability reporting and active content marketing. The website supports customer engagement through e-commerce, downloads, and contact channels, reflecting a mature digital presence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers are present, the lack of modern TLS protocols and OCSP stapling reduces security effectiveness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating gaps in security transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and consent mechanisms. The business impact of the missing SSL is significant, affecting trust and compliance. Immediate remediation is necessary to mitigate risks and align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols and disable deprecated versions to improve encryption strength.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to enhance SSL performance and security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update security headers to cover all best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern e-commerce platform (Litium) with JavaScript and integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot. Hosting is via Fastly CDN with Varnish caching, indicating a scalable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, performance data is missing, and SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking, which poses a risk to secure communications. The site structure and navigation are clear, supporting good user experience. Technical debt appears low but requires urgent attention to security protocols.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with auralight.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auralight.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.