Skip to main content

Security report for auntminniecme.com

Voxmedia, LLC · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AuntMinnieCME.com is an online platform providing radiology continuing medical education (CME) courses primarily targeting healthcare professionals such as physicians, sonographers, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses. The platform offers interactive, accredited courses with certificate management and support, operating in partnership with Voxmedia, LLC. The website is professionally designed, mobile responsive, and integrates modern web technologies including jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Analytics for tracking and performance optimization. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented, reflecting a commitment to user data protection and compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear credible and consistent with a legitimate educational service. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and publishing incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching auntminniecme.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
90
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare and education sectors, focusing on niche radiology CME courses. Its business model is based on paid online courses priced per credit hour, supported by certificate management and free email support. The partnership with Voxmedia, LLC and AuntMinnie.com enhances its market credibility and reach. The platform targets medical imaging professionals and related healthcare providers, positioning itself as a specialized provider in continuing medical education. The website's integration of interactive learning and accreditation indicates a mature offering, though the lack of publicly available domain registration data suggests a need for improved transparency. The company leverages third-party partnerships for content and accreditation, which strengthens its market position but also requires careful management of brand and trust signals.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable risk factor, as it reduces domain trustworthiness and complicates ownership verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices in security headers, incident response transparency, and domain registration visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider creating and hosting a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance with evolving standards and regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Voxmedia, LLC
Description
Online Radiology CME courses offered by AuntMinnieCME.com in conjunction with Voxmedia, LLC, providing continuing medical education credits for medical imaging professionals and related healthcare providers.
Key services
Radiology CME courses, Certificate management, Online continuing education, Support for healthcare professionals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, FontAwesome, JWPlayer, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Picturefill
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile responsive)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
BigID CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on radiology continuing medical education
  3. No forms detected on the analyzed page; search box uses JavaScript function
  4. No email addresses explicitly listed on the page
  5. Phone number provided in JSON-LD structured data
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented
  7. No explicit terms of service page found
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of established JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, jQuery UI, FontAwesome, and JWPlayer for multimedia content, indicating a mature and interactive user experience. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are employed for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern HTML5 features including the picture element with polyfills for legacy browsers. Performance appears fast with minimal load times. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected, and no advanced frameworks were identified. The technical stack is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations. The absence of explicit CMS may indicate a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but should be regularly reviewed for security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with auntminniecme.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auntminniecme.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.