Skip to main content

Security report for auntminnie.com

AuntMinnie · Healthcare · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AuntMinnie is a specialized healthcare media platform focused on radiology and medical imaging. It provides comprehensive clinical news, industry updates, educational resources, and practice management content targeted at radiology professionals and healthcare providers. The website is well-branded and positioned as a niche leader in its sector, offering services such as CME, webinars, podcasts, and advertising opportunities. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Marko Web framework, Google Tag Manager, and various analytics and advertising tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and inferred security headers, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are not detected in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from the professional presentation and trustworthiness of the site. Overall, AuntMinnie demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching auntminnie.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
77
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a medium-sized business entity in the healthcare media sector, focusing on radiology professionals worldwide. Its business model revolves around content provision, advertising, and educational services. The presence of multiple partner domains for education, careers, and regional content indicates a diversified ecosystem. The site targets a specialized audience, leveraging trusted industry news and resources to maintain market position. Revenue streams likely include advertising, sponsored content, and educational program fees. The company maintains active social media channels to engage its audience and enhance brand visibility. The lack of explicit company registration or contact details in the HTML suggests these may be located elsewhere or protected for privacy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of security headers inferred. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, security.txt, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. The extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The WHOIS data unavailability is a concern for domain legitimacy verification but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and formal vulnerability management processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy to strengthen defense against web attacks.
  4. Provide visible contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details to enhance trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AuntMinnie
Description
AuntMinnie is a specialized healthcare media platform focused on radiology news, education, and industry information. It provides clinical news, imaging informatics, industry updates, practice management resources, and educational content for radiology professionals.
Key services
Clinical news coverage, Imaging informatics updates, Industry news and analysis, Practice management resources, Educational content including CME, webinars, podcasts, Advertising and vendor directories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Publisher Tags (GPT), RudderStack Analytics, Braze, BigID CMP, Marko Web Framework, LazySizes, Fortnight Native Ads
Frameworks
Marko Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers (inferred)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input types

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, RudderStack, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager (DoubleClick)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics via GTM, RudderStack
Marketing tools
Braze, BigID CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain registration transparency.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media presence is established with official Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn accounts.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  7. Advertising and tracking scripts are extensively used but appear standard for media sites.
  8. Content is focused on radiology and medical imaging professionals.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on the Marko Web framework and Mindful CMS platform. It integrates multiple analytics and advertising technologies including Google Tag Manager, RudderStack, Braze, and Google Publisher Tags. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and lazy loading for images, contributing to good performance. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting details are not explicit but inferred to be stable and performant. Technical debt appears low, though continuous monitoring of third-party scripts is advised to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with auntminnie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auntminnie.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.