Skip to main content

Security report for augsburg.tv

a.tv GmbH & Co. KG · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

a.tv GmbH & Co. KG operates a regional media broadcasting website focused on Augsburg and the Schwaben region in Germany. The site offers live streaming, video on demand, and local news programming, targeting residents interested in regional content. The business model centers on providing accessible regional television content with advertising revenue streams. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern technologies such as WordPress, Vue.js, and Video.js for video delivery. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and privacy service integration, though some security headers could be improved. No WHOIS data is available, likely due to privacy protection, but the site shows strong legitimacy through consistent branding, active social media presence, and professional content. Overall, the site is a credible regional media platform with good technical and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching augsburg.tv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention augsburg.tv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for augsburg.tv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid position as a regional media broadcaster in the Augsburg and Schwaben area, serving a medium-sized audience with local news, events, and entertainment. Their competitive advantage lies in localized content and multi-platform delivery including live streaming and on-demand videos. Revenue likely derives from regional advertising and partnerships, as indicated by ad network usage and external partner links. The target customer segment includes local residents and German-speaking viewers interested in regional affairs. The company maintains partnerships with local media groups and job portals, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include regular content updates and active social media engagement. Strategic observations suggest continued focus on digital media delivery and privacy compliance to maintain audience trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of privacy consent management tools. Security headers are partially implemented but could be enhanced with HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options for improved protection. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks publicly disclosed incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies, which could be improved to enhance security transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good for a regional media site, with recommendations to strengthen headers and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) header to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Add X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options headers to mitigate clickjacking and MIME sniffing risks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or dedicated security policy page with incident response contacts.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and video player libraries for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
a.tv GmbH & Co. KG
Description
Fernsehen für Augsburg und Schwaben. Regional television providing news, programs, and media content focused on Augsburg and the Schwaben region.
Key services
Live TV streaming, Regional news coverage, Video on demand (Mediathek), Local event coverage, Advertising services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Video.js, Vue.js, PrivacyService (mgpd.de), Matomo Analytics, HLS streaming
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Vue.js frontend components
Platforms
Web, Mobile (responsive design)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of privacy service for consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
welocal.cloud
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics, PrivacyService Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in German targeting Augsburg and Schwaben region.
  3. Strong focus on regional media broadcasting with live streaming and video on demand.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and privacy compliance tools.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active and linked.
  8. Advertising is present but limited to a regional ad network with consent mechanisms.
  9. No security or incident response contact information publicly disclosed.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern frontend using Vue.js components and Video.js for video playback. It integrates HLS streaming for live and on-demand video content. The site uses Matomo for analytics and a privacy service from mgpd.de for consent management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The technical stack is well chosen for a media broadcaster, though hosting provider details are not explicit. The site could benefit from further performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with augsburg.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review augsburg.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.