Skip to main content

Security report for auditspluss.lv

SIA Audits Pluss · Finance · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Audits Pluss is a Latvian company specializing in auditing, accounting, and tax consulting services. The company targets local businesses and clients seeking professional financial services. Their website presents a clear and professional image with detailed descriptions of their key services including auditing, bookkeeping consultations, and asset valuation. The business operates primarily in the finance sector and appears to be a small-sized enterprise with a local market focus. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Raft theme and Contact Form 7 plugin for contact forms. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. The technical implementation is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. However, there is room for improvement in SEO and security headers. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for GDPR compliance. The absence of a clear privacy policy page and WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess the domain's legitimacy and compliance posture. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security practices, and better transparency regarding company contact information and domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching auditspluss.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Audits Pluss positions itself as a trusted provider of auditing and accounting services in Latvia. Their business model focuses on delivering personalized, high-quality services to clients, emphasizing professionalism and confidentiality. The company’s website content and service offerings suggest a focus on SMEs and local businesses. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries, and the company appears to operate independently. The lack of visible certifications or trust badges may limit competitive advantage. The company could improve market positioning by adding client testimonials, certifications, and clearer contact details. Revenue streams likely derive from auditing contracts, consulting fees, and valuation services. The website’s clean design and clear service descriptions support a professional brand image, though marketing and analytics tools are minimal, indicating a low digital marketing maturity level.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of Contact Form 7 is standard but requires proper configuration to prevent spam and injection attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. GDPR compliance is not clearly addressed, and no cookie consent mechanism is present. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits hinders domain legitimacy verification, which is a minor risk factor. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing a comprehensive privacy policy, adding cookie consent, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy page that clearly states GDPR compliance measures and data handling practices.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with EU cookie laws and improve user transparency.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and business credibility.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Audits Pluss
Description
Zvērinātu revidentu komercsabiedrība SIA “Audits Pluss” sniedz kvalitatīvus revīzijas, grāmatvedības un nodokļu konsultāciju pakalpojumus ar individuālu pieeju klientiem.
Key services
Revīzijas un pārbaudes pakalpojumi, Konsultācijas grāmatvedības uzskaites un nodokļu jautājumos, Mantisko ieguldījumu, kapitalizējamo parādsaistību un peļņas novērtēšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Contact Form 7, Raft theme, wp-emoji-release.min.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Contact Form 7 plugin for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian language focused on auditing and accounting services.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, only a footer link placeholder.
  4. Contact information is only via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with Contact Form 7 plugin.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data.
  8. HTTPS is enabled and used site-wide.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern theme (Raft) and uses Contact Form 7 for form handling. The site loads scripts such as wp-emoji-release.min.js and uses web fonts hosted locally. The HTML is valid and well-structured with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate with no heavy external dependencies or analytics scripts detected. Accessibility is basic but present, with skip links and semantic HTML. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with auditspluss.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auditspluss.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.