Audit Partner Austria Wirtschaftsprüfer GmbH is a professional services firm specializing in tax consulting and auditing services primarily serving Austrian businesses and professionals. The company emphasizes expertise, personal consultation, and proactive advisory services. Their website reflects a medium-sized firm with a consistent brand and a clear focus on finance-related services. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, hosted on Austrian DNS infrastructure. However, the website lacks a valid SSL certificate, which significantly impacts its security posture. While basic security headers like HSTS are present, they are ineffective without HTTPS. The site provides comprehensive contact information and privacy policies, but lacks cookie consent mechanisms and explicit security or incident response policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent improvements in SSL configuration and security transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
Critical
No HTTPS encryption
GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
31
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention auditpartner.at, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for auditpartner.at right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company holds a solid position in the Austrian finance sector, offering tax advisory, auditing, and related expertise services. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting businesses requiring compliance and financial consulting. The presence of certifications and a newsletter indicates active client engagement and professional credibility. The firm leverages partnerships with Microsoft Outlook for mail services and uses Austrian hosting providers, aligning with local business practices. Growth potential is supported by clear communication channels and a focus on quality service delivery.
Security posture
The current security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception risks. Although some security headers are configured, their effectiveness is nullified without HTTPS. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which may hinder timely handling of security incidents. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms also raises privacy compliance concerns. Immediate remediation of SSL issues and publication of security policies are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.
Recommendations
Acquire and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for abuse or security issues.
Enable advanced SSL features such as OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
Regularly audit and update website security headers and privacy policies to maintain compliance and user trust.
The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, hosted on Austrian DNS infrastructure (a1.net). The site uses caching and minification for CSS and JS but lacks performance metrics. The absence of HTTPS is a critical technical debt. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical modernization should prioritize SSL deployment and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with auditpartner.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auditpartner.at.