Skip to main content

Security report for audika.nl

Audika hoorzorg · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Audika hoorzorg is a well-established Dutch healthcare provider specializing in hearing care services, including professional hearing tests, hearing aid consultations, and sales. The company operates under the parent company Demant and maintains a strong market presence in the Netherlands with a professional and user-friendly website. The site is designed with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization, targeting individuals seeking hearing solutions. Technically, the website employs modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer, and a cookie consent platform, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent compliance, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and GDPR compliance, with no signs of blocking or WAF interference.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching audika.nl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention audika.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for audika.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Audika's market positioning as a leading hearing care provider in the Netherlands is supported by its comprehensive service offerings and international brand presence. The business model focuses on retail and service delivery of hearing aids and related care, targeting consumers with hearing loss or hearing care needs. The company leverages partnerships and advanced marketing tools to maintain customer engagement and optimize service delivery. The presence of multiple social media channels and a detailed cookie policy reflects a commitment to transparency and customer interaction. Growth potential is supported by digital marketing and analytics investments, although no explicit financial or founding year data is available.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Security headers are partially implied but not explicitly documented in the HTML. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The use of third-party analytics and advertising cookies is managed with user consent, reflecting good privacy practices. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and formal incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and frameworks used.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and document standard security headers explicitly (e.g., X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Maintain transparency on data retention and protection practices beyond cookie consent.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Audika hoorzorg
Description
Audika offers hearing care services including professional hearing tests, advice on hearing aids, and trial hearing devices. Formerly known as Van Boxtel.
Key services
Professional hearing tests, Hearing aid consultation, Hearing aid sales and trials
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), jQuery (validation plugin), CookieInformation cookie consent, Proxima Nova font, JSON-LD structured data
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure session cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, Microsoft UET
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Advertising (bing.com), Facebook Pixel (implied by _fbp cookie)
Tracking pixels
VWO, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft UET
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer, CookieInformation
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR
  3. Professional healthcare service provider with clear contact info
  4. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with transparency
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  6. No explicit privacy or security policy documents found beyond cookie policy
  7. No terms of service or incident response information publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Visual Website Optimizer for A/B testing, and a professional cookie consent management system. The use of Sitecore CMS is implied by cookie names and structure, indicating enterprise-grade content management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD data for enhanced search engine understanding. The site uses custom fonts and responsive design elements to ensure a consistent user experience across devices. Technical risks are minimal, but ongoing monitoring of third-party scripts and cookie usage is recommended to maintain compliance and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with audika.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review audika.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.