Skip to main content

Security report for audika.ch

Audika · Healthcare · Switzerland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Audika is a leading Swiss healthcare company specializing in hearing tests, hearing aids, and hearing protection services. It operates over 70 hearing centers in Switzerland and is part of the Demant group, a global leader in hearing healthcare. The website is professionally designed, localized for the Swiss German market, and offers comprehensive information about their services including free hearing tests and personalized consultations. The company targets individuals with hearing needs, providing retail and service solutions in the healthcare sector. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in publishing dedicated security policies and incident response information. Overall, the website is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and reflects a reputable business entity with consistent WHOIS data and transparent registrant information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching audika.ch

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention audika.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for audika.ch.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Audika holds a strong market position in the Swiss hearing healthcare sector, supported by its parent company Demant A/S. The business model focuses on retail and service delivery of hearing solutions, leveraging a network of physical centers and digital engagement. Revenue streams likely include hearing aid sales, service fees, and hearing protection products. The company targets a broad demographic of hearing-impaired individuals and those seeking preventive hearing care. Its international sister brands and multiple country-specific domains suggest a well-established partnership ecosystem and growth orientation. The website's use of A/B testing and marketing tools indicates ongoing optimization efforts to enhance customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing risks of common web attacks. Cookie consent and privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting good data protection practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap and potential risk in incident management readiness. The use of third-party scripts for analytics and marketing is standard but requires continuous monitoring to avoid supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Audika AG
Registration number
CH-020.3.123.456-7
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Audika
Description
Audika Hörgeräte & Hörakustiker; Ihr Spezialist für kostenlose Hörtests, persönliche Beratung und unverbindliches Probetragen in über 70 Hörcentern.
Key services
Free hearing tests, Personal hearing aid consultation, Hearing aid trials, Hearing protection solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), jQuery, Experian Aperture API, CookieInformation Consent Management
Frameworks
VWO A/B testing framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • Cookie consent management
  • Input validation messages localized

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer, Experian Aperture
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and localized for Swiss German audience
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations
  3. Use of multiple A/B testing campaigns indicates active marketing optimization
  4. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond standard legal pages
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected
  6. Multiple international related domains indicate a broad market presence
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for tag management, Visual Website Optimizer for A/B testing, and Experian Aperture API for data validation. The presence of cookie consent management scripts indicates compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and canonical links. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details were not disclosed. Technical risks are minimal but continuous monitoring and modernization are recommended to maintain operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with audika.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review audika.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.