Skip to main content

Security report for audia6.best

AudiA6 · Finance · Russia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AudiA6 operates an online automated currency exchange platform primarily targeting Russian-speaking users worldwide. The website offers a broad range of electronic and fiat currency exchange services with significant reserves and user testimonials supporting its market presence. The platform integrates modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and service workers to provide a responsive and functional user experience. Analytics are handled via Yandex Metrika, and live support is provided through TalkMe chat integration. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacking advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent implemented but no detailed GDPR statements. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its niche but could improve security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching audia6.best

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a medium-sized online currency exchanger founded in 2020, focusing on electronic currency and fiat cash exchanges. It leverages partnerships with multiple monitoring and rating platforms to enhance trust and visibility. The business model is transactional, earning revenue from currency exchange spreads and possibly fees. Target customers are individuals and entities needing currency exchange services, especially in Russia and CIS countries. The platform supports multiple payment methods and cryptocurrencies, indicating a broad service offering. Growth indicators include active user testimonials and integration with popular communication channels like Telegram. The partnership ecosystem includes well-known exchange monitoring sites, enhancing credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No dedicated security or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency on security governance. The use of SHA256 hashing scripts and service workers indicates some security awareness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent but no detailed GDPR compliance statements. Incident response contact channels are not provided. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with better headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response pages to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed GDPR statements and data retention policies.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Consider adding verified physical contact information and phone support to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AudiA6
Description
Автоматический обмен валют. Лучшие курсы, значительные запасы
Key services
Electronic currency exchange, Currency mixing, Exchange rate monitoring, User account management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Yandex Metrika, Service Worker, AJAX
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service worker registered
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of SHA256 script for hashing

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
TalkMe live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Russian-language online currency exchange platform with automated services.
  2. Multiple electronic currencies and fiat currencies supported with visible reserves.
  3. Contact information includes email, Telegram, Jabber, and qTox keys.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond basic user agreement and cookie notice.
  6. Use of Yandex Metrika for analytics and TalkMe for live chat support.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies implemented.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and transparent without privacy protection.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is finance-related and safe.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Font Awesome for icons. It integrates Yandex Metrika for analytics and TalkMe for live chat support. Service workers are registered for offline capabilities or performance improvements. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources asynchronously to optimize performance. SEO is supported with meta tags and sitemap links. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility features. Technical debt appears low but security-related technical improvements are needed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with audia6.best. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review audia6.best.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.