Skip to main content

Security report for atruvia.de

Atruvia AG · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atruvia AG is a large German IT service provider specializing in banking and digital transformation services. The company offers a range of key services including consulting, IT outsourcing, output solutions, and platform ecosystems, targeting professionals, students, and customers in the financial sector. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript modules and Craft CMS, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, lack of HTTPS enforcement, and missing security headers, which significantly lowers the overall security score. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism using opt-in for analytics via Matomo. Contact information is primarily available through a contact form, with no explicit phone numbers or physical addresses listed. The site links to several related domains including career and reporting subdomains, as well as a partner financial group.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of atruvia.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atruvia.de

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention atruvia.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for atruvia.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atruvia AG operates in the finance and technology sectors, providing IT services tailored to cooperative banks in Germany. Their business model focuses on digital transformation and IT outsourcing, positioning them as a key enabler for banking innovation. The company targets multiple customer segments including professionals, students, and banking clients, supported by dedicated career portals and new work initiatives. Their partnership with the Genossenschaftliche FinanzGruppe Volksbanken Raiffeisenbanken strengthens their market position. The website content and structure reflect a mature digital presence, though the lack of visible certifications or detailed business registrations limits external trust signals. The company maintains active social media channels and publishes business reports, indicating transparency and engagement with stakeholders.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential interception risks. No HTTP security headers are implemented, and modern TLS protocols are disabled, further increasing vulnerability. While DNS records show proper SPF and DMARC configurations, indicating good email security practices, the lack of security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited formal security governance. The presence of CSRF tokens in forms and opt-in cookie consent for analytics are positive practices. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS deployment and security header implementation to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable all insecure protocols.
  3. Implement essential HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  6. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  7. Consider adding explicit contact details such as phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
  8. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Craft CMS and employs modern JavaScript modules and CSS for styling. It uses PHP sessions for state management and includes a cookie consent mechanism with opt-in for Matomo analytics. The site has moderate load times (~3 seconds) and a reasonable page size (~91 KB) with 26 resources loaded. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards are properly configured. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical risks. No hosting provider information was detected. The site does not appear to use common JavaScript frameworks like React or Angular. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires security upgrades and potential hosting improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 69/100Medium31 findingsView report
  3. 69/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atruvia.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atruvia.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.