Skip to main content

Security report for atputabaulos.com

Viesu nams "Bauļi" · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website atputabaulos.com represents a small hospitality business named "Viesu nams Bauļi" located near Ventspils, Latvia. It offers a variety of leisure and accommodation services including banquet hall rental, cozy rooms, sauna, pool, and outdoor activities. The site is hosted on WordPress.com and uses standard WordPress technologies and plugins. The business targets local and regional customers seeking rural relaxation and event hosting. The website is multilingual, primarily in Latvian, with English and Russian options, enhancing accessibility to a broader audience. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and advertising networks but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration consistent with the business profile. However, there is room for improvement in privacy compliance and incident response transparency. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and suitable for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atputabaulos.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on rural leisure and event hosting. Its market position is niche and local, leveraging partnerships with nearby service providers such as riding clubs and wellness centers. Revenue streams likely include venue rental, accommodation fees, and ancillary services. The business model is direct-to-consumer with a focus on group events and family stays. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and pricing, indicating a mature digital presence for a small enterprise. The use of WordPress.com hosting suggests a cost-effective approach to online presence. The partnership ecosystem is informal but includes relevant local service providers, enhancing customer value.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and critical security headers like Content Security Policy are missing. There is no visible security.txt or incident response contact information, which limits transparency in vulnerability management. The presence of multiple third-party scripts and ad networks introduces potential attack surfaces that require regular monitoring. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no dedicated privacy policy page. Overall, the site is secure enough for its business type but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Implement Content Security Policy and other security headers to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Add a security.txt file with incident response contacts to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and advertising integrations to reduce risk.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Viesu nams "Bauļi"
Description
Viesu nams "Bauļi" netālu no Ventspils piedāvā banketu zāli, kamīnzāli, nakšņošanu ērtos numuriņos, pirts un baseina izmantošanu, kā arī dažādas atpūtas iespējas dabā.
Key services
Banketu zāles noma, Nakšņošana divvietīgos un ģimenes numuros, Kempingu mājiņas, Pirts un baseina izmantošana, Āra aktivitātes (volejbols, ūdens zorbings, dārza spēles), Sadarbības partneru piedāvājumi (jāšanas klubs, sāls terapija, disku golfs, airsoft)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, Google Analytics, Amazon Ads, Facebook SDK, Prebid.js, Gutenberg block library
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
WordAds, Amazon Ads, DoubleClick, Aditude
Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats, Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Jetpack, Prebid.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted small hospitality business site.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual options (English, Russian).
  3. No privacy policy page found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and email.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Advertising and tracking scripts are present but standard for WordPress.com sites.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Good use of Open Graph metadata for social sharing.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS hosted by Automattic Inc., utilizing Jetpack and Gutenberg block libraries. It integrates advertising via WordAds, Amazon Ads, and DoubleClick, and uses Facebook SDK for social features. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to improve load times. However, the absence of advanced security headers and DNSSEC indicates some technical debt in security hardening. The site is well-structured and professionally designed, suitable for a small hospitality business but with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atputabaulos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atputabaulos.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.