Skip to main content

Security report for atmo.org

ATMOsphere · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ATMOsphere is a globally recognized event organizer specializing in conferences and networking events focused on natural refrigerants and clean cooling technologies. Established in 2009 and managed by the parent company shecco, ATMOsphere serves as a market accelerator by bringing together key industry stakeholders including policy makers, manufacturers, and end users. The website effectively communicates the business purpose, upcoming events, and team information, supported by multimedia testimonials and social media engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern plugins to enhance user experience and analytics. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of a privacy policy represent significant security and compliance gaps. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but GDPR compliance cannot be fully confirmed due to missing privacy documentation. Overall, the business credibility is strong, but the security posture requires urgent improvement to protect user data and build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atmo.org

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ATMOsphere holds a strong market position as a niche event organizer in the energy sector, specifically targeting the HVACR industry and natural refrigerants market. Their business model revolves around organizing flagship conferences and smaller networking events that facilitate knowledge exchange and market acceleration. The company benefits from a well-established partnership with shecco, enhancing its credibility and operational capacity. Revenue streams likely include event sponsorships, ticket sales, and partnerships. The target customer segments include industry professionals, manufacturers, policy makers, and technology providers. The presence of a professional team and extensive event history indicates stable growth and a robust partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS, which exposes users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers like X-Content-Type-Options and X-XSS-Protection are present, the absence of TLS protocols, HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption significantly reduces the security level. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are found, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The missing privacy policy further exacerbates compliance risks, especially under GDPR. Overall, the site requires immediate implementation of SSL/TLS and comprehensive privacy documentation to enhance security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  3. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  4. Add an incident response page or contact channel for security issues (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and ensure all plugins and libraries are up to date.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder and several plugins such as MonsterInsights for analytics and Essential Blocks for enhanced content features. Hosting is provided by SiteGround, as indicated by DNS and HTTP headers. The site uses jQuery and other JavaScript libraries for interactive elements. Performance data is unavailable, but the site appears to be mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, the lack of SSL and modern TLS protocols is a critical technical deficiency. The site uses Google Analytics for user tracking, integrated via MonsterInsights plugin. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atmo.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atmo.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.