Skip to main content

Security report for atlantik.cz

ATLANTIK finanční trhy, a.s. · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ATLANTIK finanční trhy, a.s. is a Czech financial services company specializing in depositary services for investment funds. It operates under authorization from the Czech National Bank and is part of the J&T financial group since 2010. The company focuses on custody, asset safekeeping, and control functions for various types of investment funds. The website presents clear business information and warnings about fraudulent entities using similar names, enhancing trust. Technically, the site runs on Drupal 7 with legacy jQuery libraries and shows a missing custom theme error, indicating some maintenance gaps. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is supported by a cookie banner and privacy policy page. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from modernization and improved security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atlantik.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention atlantik.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
34
Employees
0
Customers
34
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for atlantik.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ATLANTIK holds a stable position in the Czech financial market as a depositary service provider integrated within the J&T financial group. Its business model centers on servicing investment funds with custody and control services, targeting institutional clients and qualified investors. The company has a long domain history consistent with its founding date and maintains clear legal and contact information. The warning against a fraudulent similarly named company shows active brand protection. The absence of social media presence and limited marketing tools suggests a focus on B2B institutional clients rather than retail marketing. Growth indicators include integration with J&T Banka and registration with the Czech National Bank as a depositary.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the missing Drupal theme causes an error message that could reveal internal paths, which is a minor security concern. There is no evidence of advanced security headers or explicit incident response policies. The site lacks vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files, which are recommended for transparency. The use of outdated jQuery and Drupal 7 may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not regularly patched. Overall, security practices are basic but could be significantly improved with updates and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the missing Drupal theme error to eliminate error messages and improve professionalism.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Upgrade Drupal and jQuery to supported, secure versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to enhance transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ATLANTIK finanční trhy, a.s.
Registration number
26218062
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ATLANTIK finanční trhy, a.s.
Description
ATLANTIK finanční trhy, a.s. is a Czech financial services company acting as a securities dealer authorized by the Czech National Bank. It currently provides depositary services for investment funds, including standard, special, and qualified investor funds. The company is part of the J&T financial group since 2010 and fully integrated client services with J&T Banka in 2021.
Key services
Depositary services for investment funds, Custody and asset safekeeping, Control and oversight of fund transactions and valuations
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.4.4, Drupal 7, CKEditor
Frameworks
Drupal 7
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URLs (https://atlantik.cz/)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Drupal 7 CMS with some outdated components.
  2. Missing custom theme causes visible error message, reducing professionalism.
  3. Clear warnings about fraudulent companies using similar names enhance trust.
  4. No visible forms collecting personal data on the main page.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with official company emails and addresses.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  8. No explicit privacy or security certifications displayed.
  9. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS with jQuery 1.4.4 and CKEditor. The presence of a missing custom theme causes a visible error message, indicating some technical debt and maintenance issues. The site uses multiple CSS imports and JavaScript files hosted on the same domain, suggesting self-hosted infrastructure. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features or ARIA roles observed. SEO is basic with canonical and shortlink tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but DNS uses forpsi.net and forpsi.it name servers. Overall, the technical stack is functional but dated and would benefit from modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atlantik.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atlantik.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.