Skip to main content

Security report for atico.cz

ATICO · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ATICO is a medium-sized Czech energy company specializing in high-voltage and low-voltage electrical distribution systems, energy centers, and manufacturing of low-voltage switchboards including control systems. The company emphasizes innovation, professional approach, and over 30 years of industry experience, targeting business clients primarily in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Their service portfolio includes consulting, manufacturing, installation, monitoring (ATICONTROL), and 24/7 maintenance services. The website is professionally designed, bilingual (Czech and English), and provides clear navigation and relevant business content. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, ensuring compliance with GDPR and privacy standards. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and bot protection, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the overall digital presence and business information support legitimacy. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are found on the site, which could be improved for better customer engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 28 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atico.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ATICO holds a solid position in the Czech energy sector with a focus on electrical distribution and energy solutions. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end services from consulting to manufacturing and maintenance, serving a regional client base in Czechia and Slovakia. The company leverages a proprietary monitoring system (ATICONTROL) indicating a technology-driven approach. The partnership with Beneš & Michl for website development suggests professional marketing and digital presence. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor red flag but does not outweigh the company's apparent operational maturity and market focus. The company targets medium-sized to large business clients requiring specialized energy infrastructure solutions. Growth indicators include a significant number of completed projects and clients, as displayed on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published incident response or security policy information limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add clear company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to facilitate customer and security incident communications.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues arise.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ATICO
Description
Česká energetická společnost v oblasti silnoproudých rozvodů a energocenter s vlastní výrobou NN rozvaděčů včetně systémů řízení.
Key services
Projekce a poradenství, Výroba a montáž rozvaděčů, Instalace VN a NN, ATICONTROL, Servis 24/7 a údržba
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), jQuery (implied by $ usage), Cookie Consent scripts, SVG graphics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in for analytics
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leady
Marketing tools
Leady
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Czech language with English version available.
  3. Professional energy sector company with clear service offerings.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented properly.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain transparency.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  7. Social media presence confirmed via LinkedIn link.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics for traffic analysis, Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation, and cookie consent scripts for privacy compliance. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site build. Performance is moderate with preloading and prefetching of assets. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses SVG graphics and asynchronous script loading to improve user experience. Technical debt appears low, but adding accessibility improvements and security headers would enhance the overall technical quality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atico.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atico.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.