Skip to main content

Security report for atag.lv

Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ATAG.LV is a small Latvian business specializing in providing Archery Tag, a team-based game combining archery and dodgeball, for events. The website offers scheduling and booking functionality, targeting individuals and groups interested in recreational team activities. The business operates in the hospitality and entertainment sector with a niche market position in Latvia. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Tailwind CSS, Hotwired Turbo, and Stimulus JS, indicating a contemporary and maintainable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens in forms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy page present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional, secure at a basic level, and business credible, but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atag.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates an event-based business model offering Archery Tag sessions primarily in Latvia. Its revenue streams likely include fixed hourly rates for game sessions plus additional fees for transportation and venue rental. The target customers are event organizers and groups seeking unique team-building or recreational activities. The website's booking calendar and contact forms facilitate lead generation and customer engagement. The absence of social media links or extensive partner domains suggests a focused but limited digital ecosystem. The business appears to maintain consistent branding and professional content, supporting moderate trustworthiness. Growth opportunities may include expanding marketing channels and enhancing privacy and security disclosures to build customer confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection on forms. However, it lacks visible security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is partial; while a privacy policy exists, there is no cookie consent mechanism, which may be a GDPR compliance gap. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel) indicates data collection practices that should be clearly disclosed. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be strengthened with improved headers, policies, and consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to increase trust and preparedness.
  4. Attempt to retrieve and publish verified WHOIS domain registration data to improve legitimacy and trust signals.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize unnecessary data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Experience the thrilling combination of archery and dodgeball with Archery Tag. Join us for an action-packed adventure where you can test your aim, agility, and teamwork. Book your Archery Tag session today!
Key services
Archery Tag sessions, Event hosting, Game scheduling and booking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Hotwired Turbo, Stimulus JS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses modern frontend technologies and tracking tools.
  4. Clear contact information with company email and phone number present.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found, though privacy policy page exists.
  6. No security policy or incident response information published.
  7. Business focuses on Archery Tag event services in Latvia.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Tailwind CSS for styling and Hotwired Turbo and Stimulus JS for frontend interactivity, suggesting a Ruby on Rails backend. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts for Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, indicating integration with marketing and analytics platforms. The HTML is well-structured with meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS is explicitly detected, implying a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy mechanisms to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atag.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atag.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.