Skip to main content

Security report for asuransiallianz.id

Asuransi Allianz Indonesia · Finance · Indonesia

Partial score · DNS & email only

70/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asuransi Allianz Indonesia presents itself as an insurance service provider offering life, health, and investment insurance products targeted at families in Indonesia. The website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site content is well-structured and professionally branded, but lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information. The domain WHOIS data raises concerns due to a future creation date and registrant mismatch, impacting trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the website is functional and informative but requires improvements in compliance, transparency, and security to enhance credibility and trust.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: ghs.googel.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asuransiallianz.id

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
60
DNS health
45
Network security
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention asuransiallianz.id, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for asuransiallianz.id right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the finance sector, specifically insurance, targeting general consumers seeking family protection products. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on insurance and investment products. The website content suggests a small-sized company with a recent establishment date. The lack of detailed company information, contact data, and certifications limits competitive advantage and market positioning insights. The extensive list of unrelated external links suggests possible SEO or backlink strategies but does not indicate direct partnerships. The absence of social media presence and analytics tools suggests limited digital marketing maturity.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, providing basic transport security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is available, indicating low maturity in security governance. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. The suspicious WHOIS data further reduces trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and local regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency.
  4. Deploy security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance web security.
  5. Establish an incident response policy and publish relevant contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asuransi Allianz Indonesia
Description
Asuransi Allianz Indonesia menawarkan solusi perlindungan lengkap untuk keluarga Anda dengan produk asuransi jiwa, kesehatan, dan investasi yang fleksibel. Dilengkapi layanan profesional dan kemudahan klaim, Allianz siap menjaga masa depan dan kesejahteraan orang-orang tercinta.
Key services
asuransi jiwa, asuransi kesehatan, investasi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Site uses WordPress with Yoast SEO plugin
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content
  6. Domain WHOIS data shows suspicious future creation date
  7. No social media links found
  8. Content is focused on insurance services in Indonesia
  9. Many external links to unrelated Indonesian domains
  10. No advertising or analytics scripts detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with common plugins such as Yoast SEO, jQuery, and Slick Carousel. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but does not use DNSSEC. The HTML is valid and includes structured data in JSON-LD format for SEO. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. Mobile optimization is good with responsive meta tags and CSS. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA landmarks and skip links. SEO optimization is good due to meta tags and structured data. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, indicating technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asuransiallianz.id. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asuransiallianz.id.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.