Skip to main content

Security report for astarte.lv

Astarte-Nafta · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Astarte-Nafta operates as a regional energy company in Latvia, specializing in fuel retail and wholesale services. Their offerings include fuel delivery to farmers and fishermen, customer loyalty programs, and ancillary services such as food sales and trailer rentals. The company maintains a professional online presence with a mobile app and active social media channels, positioning itself as a trusted fuel supplier in its market segment. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frontend technologies like jQuery and Bootstrap, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and includes cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with GDPR requirements. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, though the absence of explicit security headers suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital infrastructure supporting a medium-sized business in the energy sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching astarte.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention astarte.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for astarte.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets vehicle owners, agricultural and fishing sectors, and wholesale customers, leveraging a multi-channel business model combining retail fuel stations, wholesale fuel delivery, and value-added services. The presence of a mobile app and customer loyalty cards indicates a focus on customer retention and digital engagement. Market positioning appears stable with a clear brand identity and consistent messaging. The company benefits from integration with major app platforms and social media, enhancing customer reach. However, the lack of visible contact details on the homepage may limit direct customer engagement. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, suggesting independent operation. The business model is diversified within the energy retail sector, supporting resilience and growth potential.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, uses cookie consent banners, and integrates standard analytics and marketing scripts responsibly. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks explicit security or incident response policies publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a commercial website but would benefit from implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance site security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Add clear company contact information on the website to facilitate customer and security communications.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Astarte-Nafta
Description
Degvielas uzpildes stacijas. Degvielas piegāde Lauksaimniekiem, Zvejniekiem, vairumtirdzniecība. Burgeri, hotdogi, kafija. Piekabju noma. Vinjetes
Key services
Fuel retail and wholesale, Fuel delivery to farmers and fishermen, Mobile app for fuel services, Customer loyalty cards, Food services (burgers, hotdogs, coffee), Trailer rental, Vignette sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bootstrap Grid, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress, Bootstrap
Platforms
Google Play Store, Apple App Store
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the energy and fuel retail sector.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media presence is active on Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content; potential area for improvement.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; domain registration details unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a Bootstrap grid layout and uses jQuery and Slick Carousel for frontend interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and uses a cookie consent plugin to comply with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with astarte.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review astarte.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.