Skip to main content

Security report for asr-berlin.de

asr Allianz Selbständiger Reiseunternehmen Bundesverband e.V. · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The asr Allianz Selbständiger Reiseunternehmen Bundesverband e.V. is a well-established German non-profit trade association representing medium-sized independent travel companies including travel agencies, tour operators, and service providers. The organization focuses on political advocacy, networking, consulting, and training to support the tourism industry’s medium-sized enterprises. With over 3,500 member companies and active participation in federal tourism advisory boards, the asr holds a strong market position within the German tourism sector. The website reflects this professionalism with clear navigation, relevant content, and a consistent brand presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asr-berlin.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention asr-berlin.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for asr-berlin.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on serving the interests of the medium-sized tourism sector through advocacy, member services, and educational offerings. The association leverages partnerships with sponsors and training academies to enhance value for members. The target audience includes independent travel companies seeking networking, political representation, and professional development. The website’s integration of partner domains and social media channels supports a broad ecosystem approach. Growth indicators include active event participation and online course offerings. The organization maintains a credible and trusted reputation in the German tourism industry.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communications. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, and incident response contact information is not publicly available. The use of popular WordPress plugins and frameworks suggests a standard security baseline but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security and privacy training for site administrators.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
asr Allianz Selbständiger Reiseunternehmen Bundesverband e.V.
Description
Reiseverband zur Förderung mittelständischer Reiseunternehmen, unabhängige Beratung, Netzwerkbildung und Vertretung in Politik und Wirtschaft.
Key services
Political advocacy, Networking, Consulting, Training and certification courses, Member benefits including travel agent cards and event access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, Booked Appointments plugin, Rapidmail newsletter integration
Frameworks
Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WooCommerce and Contact Form 7 usage)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rapidmail (newsletter), Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional association site for medium-sized travel companies in Germany.
  2. Content is in German and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem plugins and page builder.
  5. Includes newsletter subscription form with explicit consent checkbox.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
  7. No visible security.txt or incident response contact info.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor as the page builder and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It integrates several plugins including Contact Form 7, Booked Appointments, and Yoast SEO Premium, indicating a mature and feature-rich technical stack. The site loads moderate performance assets and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the domain uses standard DNS servers without privacy protection. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asr-berlin.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asr-berlin.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.