Skip to main content

Security report for aspit.no

Aspit AS · Healthcare · Norway

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aspit AS is a Norwegian small-sized company specializing in healthcare journal systems, primarily serving musculoskeletal therapists, psychologists, and psychiatrists in Norway. Their key offerings include the Physica and Psykbase journal systems, supported by dedicated customer portals. The company emphasizes local development in Seljord and green, secure data hosting within Norway. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management, hosted on a green-certified data center. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, providing a professional user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though formal security policies and incident response details are absent. Overall, the website and WHOIS data align well, indicating a trustworthy and legitimate business presence.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Medium

      Service Exposed: SSH

      Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

      What to do: Review if public access to SSH is necessary

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Keep watching aspit.no

This scan found 7 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aspit AS occupies a niche market within the Norwegian healthcare technology sector, focusing on electronic journal systems tailored to specific healthcare professionals. Their business model revolves around software provision and support services, with clear partnerships to Physica and Psykbase platforms. The company demonstrates growth potential through digital presence and green hosting commitments. Their target customers are healthcare providers requiring compliant and secure journal systems. The company maintains a consistent brand and leverages social media for outreach. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent via Cookiebot, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Security headers are not explicitly detected, which could enhance protection against common web threats. The current setup supports GDPR compliance but would benefit from formalized security documentation and incident handling processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and expose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Maintain and communicate clear data retention and privacy practices to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aspit AS
Registration number
983 439 977
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aspit AS
Description
Aspits journalsystemer er utviklet i Seljord i tett samarbeid med norske behandlere.
Key services
Physica - journal system for musculoskeletal therapists, Psykbase - journal system for psychologists and psychiatrists, Customer portals and support services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Custom CSS and JS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via POST

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on healthcare journal systems for Norwegian professionals.
  3. Clear contact information and social media presence enhance trust.
  4. Cookie consent is properly implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response info published.
  6. Technical implementation uses modern tools and good SEO practices.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern front-end technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. It uses Google Fonts and custom CSS/JS assets. Hosting is provided by Green Mountain, a green-certified data center in Norway, aligning with the company's sustainability claims. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata present. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. The site is free from broken elements and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO and business information. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement additional security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aspit.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aspit.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.