Skip to main content

Security report for aspetar.com

Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital · Healthcare · Qatar

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital is a leading healthcare institution specializing in sports medicine, orthopaedic surgery, rehabilitation, and scientific support. The hospital is internationally recognized with multiple accreditations and partnerships, positioning it as a premier destination for athlete care and sports injury treatment in Qatar and beyond. The website reflects a comprehensive service offering targeting athletes, medical professionals, and patients seeking specialized care. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with modern front-end libraries such as Bootstrap and jQuery, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. The site integrates Google Analytics for user tracking but lacks advanced privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure form submissions but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration with the business claims. Overall, the website demonstrates strong business credibility and content quality but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aspetar.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aspetar holds a strong market position as a specialized sports medicine hospital with a comprehensive ecosystem including clinical services, research, education, and partnerships with major sports and academic organizations. Its business model focuses on providing high-quality healthcare services to athletes and sports professionals, supported by scientific research and education initiatives. The hospital's partnerships with entities like Aspire Zone and international sports federations enhance its competitive advantage and growth potential. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with a clear target audience and well-defined service offerings.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The use of HTTPS and secure form handling are positive indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. To elevate security maturity, the organization should implement recommended headers, publish security policies, and consider a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Registration number
Registration Now
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital
Description
Aspetar is a specialized orthopaedic and sports medicine hospital providing clinical services, research, education, and rehabilitation focused on sports injuries and athlete care.
Key services
Sports Medicine, Orthopaedic Surgery, Rehabilitation, Scientific Support, Clinical Support Services, Diagnostic and Evaluation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.4, Bootstrap 4, Owl Carousel, FontAwesome, Google Analytics
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via POST

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong presence of healthcare and sports medicine related content.
  3. Multiple accreditations and partnerships enhance trust.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. No cookie consent banner detected despite use of tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Use of ASP.NET WebForms technology indicates a traditional enterprise web platform.
  8. Social media integration is present and active.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional ASP.NET WebForms backend with modern front-end libraries such as Bootstrap 4, jQuery 3.6.4, Owl Carousel, and FontAwesome icons. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical debt observed. Opportunities exist to modernize the backend framework and improve accessibility compliance. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aspetar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aspetar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.