Skip to main content

Security report for asp.com

Advanced Sterilization Products, Inc. · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Advanced Sterilization Products, Inc. (ASP) is a leading healthcare company specializing in infection prevention and sterilization products. The company offers a broad portfolio including terminal sterilization systems, sterilization monitoring, and high-level disinfection solutions, targeting healthcare professionals and institutions. ASP is positioned as a market leader with strong branding and a comprehensive product offering, supported by its parent company Fortive Corporation. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence with multi-regional support and extensive product information. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 with modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and AOS for animations. It demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. The site uses HTTPS and integrates tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, with clear privacy and cookie policies indicating GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and secure form handling but lacks explicit security headers and a public security policy or incident response page. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the strong corporate branding and external references mitigate concerns. Overall, the website is a secure, professional, and compliant digital asset for ASP, with recommendations to enhance security headers and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy to further improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asp.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASP operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on sterilization and infection prevention products. Its business model is B2B, serving hospitals and healthcare providers. The company benefits from its parent Fortive Corporation's backing, enhancing market credibility. ASP's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive product portfolio, regulatory clearances, and strong brand recognition. The website supports multiple languages and regions, indicating a global market reach. The company leverages digital marketing and social media channels effectively. Growth indicators include recent product launches and participation in industry conferences. The partnership ecosystem includes Fortive and regional subsidiaries, supporting localized operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and secure form handling via Drupal's framework. However, it lacks several recommended HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No public security policy or incident response contact information is provided, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, limiting external security researcher engagement. The site uses third-party tracking scripts responsibly with cookie consent mechanisms in place, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by adopting additional headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response page with contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize risk.
  5. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency by ensuring accurate and publicly available domain registration data.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Advanced Sterilization Products, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Advanced Sterilization Products, Inc.
Description
ASP is a leader in infection prevention, dedicated to creating products, solutions, and processes to protect patients during critical moments.
Key services
Terminal Sterilization Systems, Sterilization Monitoring, High-Level Disinfection, Connectivity Solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, Drupal 10, jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Colorbox
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens (Drupal standard)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available from provided raw output.
  3. Strong branding and professional healthcare focus.
  4. Multiple language and regional versions supported.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and Drupal CMS.
  8. Privacy and cookie policies present and GDPR compliant.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging PHP and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, jQuery UI, and Bootstrap for responsive design and UI components. It uses AOS for scroll animations and Colorbox for modal dialogs. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and meta tags supporting SEO. Performance is optimized with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive images. Accessibility features include skip links and ARIA attributes. The multi-language support and regional site redirection indicate a mature internationalization strategy. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found but HTTPS and performance indicate a reliable hosting environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.