Skip to main content

Security report for asocorporatechallenges.com

A.S.O. · Energy · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A.S.O. Corporate Challenges is a medium-sized French company specializing in organizing corporate team building and hospitality events linked to prestigious international sporting events such as marathons, golf tournaments, and cycling races. The website is professionally designed using Drupal 7 CMS and incorporates modern tracking and consent tools like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust. While the site provides detailed event information and external links to partner resources, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service documentation, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with some best practices observed, but improvements are needed in DNS security and HTTP headers. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business profile, and no blocking or WAF mechanisms hinder content access.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asocorporatechallenges.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets corporate clients seeking unique team building experiences through participation in major sporting events. Its business model revolves around event organization and corporate hospitality, leveraging partnerships with event organizers and media outlets. The website content and external links indicate a strong partnership ecosystem, including links to timeto.com and lequipe.fr. The company appears well-positioned in a niche market with a focus on premium corporate experiences. Growth potential exists through expanding event offerings and enhancing digital presence.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The use of Drupal 7, an older CMS version, may pose security risks if not properly maintained. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Upgrade or patch Drupal CMS to the latest supported version to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish and publish incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A.S.O.
Description
A.S.O. Corporate Challenges organizes corporate team building events linked to major international sporting events such as marathons, golf tournaments, cycling races, and other sports challenges.
Key services
Corporate team building events, Corporate hospitality packages, Event participation facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Drupal 7, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage.
  3. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML.
  5. Website uses Drupal 7 CMS and jQuery libraries.
  6. Multiple corporate sporting events promoted with detailed descriptions.
  7. External links mostly to event details and partner sites.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  10. WHOIS data shows domain is well established and not privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS and uses jQuery and other JavaScript libraries for UI and animations. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, and OneTrust manages cookie consent. The site appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but could benefit from improved accessibility and SEO practices. Hosting provider details are not explicit, and no advanced CDN or cloud hosting indicators were found. The site uses standard HTML and CSS with some inline scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but somewhat dated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asocorporatechallenges.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asocorporatechallenges.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.