Skip to main content

Security report for asociatiabrokerilor.ro

Asociația Brokerilor · Finance · Romania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asociația Brokerilor is a Romanian association representing and promoting the interests of brokers in the capital market. The website provides information about their advocacy, promotion of investments, and professional training services for capital market personnel. The site is built on the Wix platform, using standard Wix technologies and scripts, with minimal tracking via Sentry. The technical infrastructure is basic, with moderate performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is limited, with no evident security headers or privacy policies, and WHOIS data is privacy protected by ROTLD, which is typical for Romanian domains. Overall, the site appears legitimate but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asociatiabrokerilor.ro

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates in the finance sector, focusing on broker representation and capital market development in Romania. Its business model is non-profit and advocacy-based, targeting brokers and investors. The website content is basic but relevant to its audience. There is no evidence of commercial activities or partnerships from the website content. The lack of detailed contact and compliance information suggests room for maturity improvement in digital presence and governance.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. The use of Sentry for error monitoring is a positive security practice, but no incident response or security policy information is available. The absence of contact emails or security contacts limits incident reporting capabilities. Overall, the security posture is basic and should be improved to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility features for better user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asociația Brokerilor
Description
Reprezintă, promovează și apără interesele comunității brokerilor din piața de capital; promovează investițiile și măsurile de dezvoltare a pieței de capital; asigură cadrul necesar formării profesionale pentru personalul din piața de capital.
Key services
Representation and advocacy for brokers, Promotion of capital market investments, Professional training for capital market personnel
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, Sentry (error monitoring), Core-js polyfills
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and styles.
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in the HTML.
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to ROTLD privacy policies.
  6. Content is focused on finance and broker representation in Romania.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Minimal tracking and analytics usage (Sentry only).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Wix, leveraging Wix's CMS and infrastructure. It uses JavaScript polyfills and Sentry for error monitoring. The site has moderate performance and basic SEO metadata but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern but minimal, with opportunities to enhance performance and security configurations. No custom frameworks or backend technologies are evident from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asociatiabrokerilor.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asociatiabrokerilor.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.