Skip to main content

Security report for asociaceocr.cz

Asociace organizací cestovního ruchu z.s.p.o · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asociace organizací cestovního ruchu z.s.p.o is a Czech non-profit association representing regional tourism organizations and destination management entities. With over 10 years of experience, it focuses on supporting the development and certification of destination management organizations (DMOs) in the Czech Republic. The website reflects a professional presence with active news updates and partnerships with key tourism and governmental bodies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern frontend technologies like Bootstrap and jQuery, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the site content and partner affiliations suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is suitable for its target audience but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asociaceocr.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association occupies a niche in the Czech tourism sector, focusing on collaboration among regional tourism organizations and destination management certification. Its business model is non-profit, relying on partnerships with government and tourism entities. The website's content and partner logos indicate strong local market integration and credibility. The target audience includes regional tourism bodies and stakeholders interested in destination marketing and management. The association's certification program for DMOs is a key service, enhancing its market position. Growth indicators include active news updates and cooperation with recognized partners. However, the lack of visible contact emails and phone numbers may limit direct engagement opportunities.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, indicating limited transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms is a compliance concern, especially under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility by providing verified company emails and phone numbers for better user engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Asociace organizací cestovního ruchu z.s.p.o
Registration number
72089423
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asociace organizací cestovního ruchu z.s.p.o
Description
Asociace krajských organizací cestovního ruchu a krajských organizací destinačního managementu v ČR, pracující více než 10 let na rozvoji cestovního ruchu v České republice.
Key services
Support and development of regional tourism organizations, Certification of destination management organizations (DMO), Information sharing and cooperation among members
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based tourism association site for Czech regional tourism organizations.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response info published.
  5. Site uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries but lacks security headers.
  6. Contact info includes physical address and social media links but no verified company emails or phone numbers explicitly shown.
  7. Terms of Service link present but URLs appear placeholders.
  8. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and uses jQuery and FontAwesome for frontend functionality and icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators but good mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility tags detected. SEO optimization is basic, with meta viewport and charset tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small to medium non-profit organization website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asociaceocr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asociaceocr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.