Skip to main content

Security report for asoa.org

American Society of Ophthalmic Administrators · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The American Society of Ophthalmic Administrators (ASOA) is a professional association dedicated to empowering ophthalmic leaders and administrators through education, resources, certification programs, and community engagement. Founded in 1986, ASOA serves a niche market within the healthcare sector, focusing on the business and administrative aspects of ophthalmology practices. The website reflects a mature organization with a clear mission and a broad range of member services including career advancement, practice resources, and advocacy support. Technically, the website is built on a modern CMS platform (Sitecore) and employs a variety of contemporary web technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and Coveo search integration. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and well-structured, providing a positive user experience. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent management, although explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy page are absent. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices but could improve transparency by publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information. The lack of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is common for non-profit organizations and does not significantly detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional front with moderate risk. Strategically, ASOA should enhance its security posture by implementing recommended headers and policies, improve privacy compliance disclosures, and consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting. These steps will strengthen trust and align with best practices for professional associations in healthcare.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asoa.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention asoa.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for asoa.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASOA occupies a specialized segment in the healthcare industry, targeting ophthalmic administrators and practice managers. Its business model is membership-driven, offering educational content, certification programs, and networking opportunities. Revenue likely derives from membership fees, event registrations, certification fees, and partnerships with strategic business partners. The organization maintains strong partnerships with related ophthalmology entities such as ASCRS and VMG Health, enhancing its market reach and resource offerings. The presence of testimonials and strategic partners indicates a well-established reputation and active community engagement. Growth indicators include ongoing certification programs and digital resources like webinars and podcasts. The partnership ecosystem supports both educational and advocacy efforts, positioning ASOA as a key player in ophthalmic practice management.

Security posture

ASOA's website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and implements a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact, which are important for transparency and compliance. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional headers, publishing security documentation, and formalizing incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security collaboration.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures, including GDPR-related information and data retention policies, to align with regulatory requirements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
American Society of Ophthalmic Administrators
Description
Founded in 1986, ASOA empowers ophthalmic leaders to elevate the business of ophthalmology through education, innovation, support and collaboration.
Key services
Membership programs, Practice resource library, Career and advancement tools, Education and meetings, Advocacy, Certification programs (COE, CEP, CPSS), Webinars and podcasts, Networking community (EyeMail)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Coveo Search UI, CookieYes Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong focus on professional education and community for ophthalmic administrators.
  3. Multiple external trusted domains linked for resources and partnerships.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  5. No visible security or privacy policy pages explicitly labeled but legal disclaimers present.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Sitecore CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrating advanced search capabilities via Coveo. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, along with Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. CookieYes is used for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with a clear navigation structure and professional design. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and rich media content. There is no explicit hosting provider information, but the presence of Cloudflare Insights suggests CDN usage. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and streamline script loading for better performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asoa.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asoa.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.