Skip to main content

Security report for asl-paris.com

A.S.L · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A.S.L is a Paris-based architecture studio founded in 2000, specializing in hospitality projects and extending its craft into a curated line of objects and furniture. The company positions itself as a niche player combining architectural design with retail of design objects and art curation, targeting design-conscious clients and hospitality industry professionals. The website is professionally designed using modern technologies such as Next.js and integrates e-commerce capabilities via Shopify collections. It employs standard analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Klaviyo, with GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies in place. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, though improvements such as DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence aligned with the company's boutique market positioning.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asl-paris.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality and design sectors, leveraging its architectural expertise to offer a product line of furniture and curated artworks. Its business model combines service (architecture) and product sales (retail). The website's content and social media presence indicate a focus on high-end, design-savvy clientele. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via contact forms. The company maintains a consistent brand image and demonstrates trustworthiness through professional content and privacy compliance. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent small business structure.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as CSP or HSTS suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site collects user data via forms and tracking scripts but provides GDPR-compliant notices and consent mechanisms. Incident response and security policies are not publicly documented, which could be a gap in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business scale but improvable.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A.S.L
Description
A.S.L is an architecture studio that edits its own line of objects and furniture, as a natural extension of its craft. Founded in 2000 by Antoine Ricardou and Clémentine Larroumet, the studio is known for hospitality projects and designs places as worlds including furniture and curated artworks.
Key services
Architecture design, Furniture and object design, Art curation, Retail of design objects and vintage items
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo, Affilae
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is rich and relevant to architecture and design.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  8. Social media presence is active and linked.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework with Sanity.io as CMS and Shopify for e-commerce collections. It uses asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through further optimization of assets and caching. The technical stack is current and supports scalability, but security enhancements and SEO improvements could be further developed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asl-paris.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asl-paris.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.