Skip to main content

Security report for askthefed.org

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis · Finance · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ask the Fed® is an educational program operated by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, providing financial and regulatory updates to bankers and their boards through webinars and conference calls. The website serves as a login portal for registered users to access these resources. The business operates under the Federal Reserve System umbrella, positioning itself as a trusted authority in the finance sector. The content is professional, targeted, and consistent with the Federal Reserve's branding and mission. Technically, the website uses a modern but somewhat dated tech stack including AngularJS, jQuery, and Bootstrap. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, though accessibility features appear basic. Security practices include use of anti-forgery tokens and secure form submission, but visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are lacking. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure, but the domain is a subdomain of a legitimate Federal Reserve domain, supporting its authenticity. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and transparency around incident response. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. Privacy compliance is good with a clear privacy policy and contact information, though cookie consent is missing. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, suitable for its audience. Risk is low but recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding cookie consent, and publishing security policies to improve compliance and trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching askthefed.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis operates Ask the Fed® as a specialized program targeting banking professionals and their boards, delivering timely regulatory and financial insights. The program's market position is authoritative within the finance and government sectors, leveraging the Federal Reserve's reputation. The business model is informational and educational, relying on webinars and conference calls rather than direct commercial transactions. The target customers are banking institutions and their leadership, indicating a niche but critical audience. The website supports this with clear branding and professional content. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data, but the program is clearly integrated within the Federal Reserve System. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the program's ongoing updates and expert involvement suggest sustained relevance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. Use of HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The login form uses POST with anti-forgery tokens, indicating awareness of common web security practices. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and contact email. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational government site but could be improved with enhanced headers, cookie consent, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Verify and ensure SSL/TLS configuration is robust and enforced site-wide.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and frameworks to avoid vulnerabilities and technical debt.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Description
Ask the Fed® is a program covering the latest financial and regulatory developments for bankers and their boards of directors. It consists of periodic conference calls/webinars featuring Fed experts and guest speakers on top banking questions of the day.
Key services
Conference calls, Webinars, Expert presentations, Q&A sessions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, AngularJS, Modernizr
Frameworks
AngularJS, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of anti-forgery token in login form
  • Login form uses POST method
  • Warning modal about unauthorized access and monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Ask the Fed®, a Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis program.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at banking professionals.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, but domain is a subdomain of a trusted federal reserve domain.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. No visible security headers in provided data; recommend review.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in provided HTML.
  8. Contact email is provided in footer for user inquiries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of AngularJS, jQuery, Bootstrap, and Modernizr, indicating a moderately modern but somewhat legacy front-end stack. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta viewport and compatibility tags for responsiveness and browser support. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA roles or advanced accessibility features evident. SEO optimization is basic, with a descriptive title but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with askthefed.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review askthefed.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.