Skip to main content

Security report for asekol.cz

ASEKOL · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASEKOL is a well-established collective system specializing in the collection and recycling of end-of-life electrical appliances in the Czech Republic. With over 20 years of experience, ASEKOL operates a comprehensive nationwide network of collection points and collaborates with manufacturers, importers, municipalities, and other stakeholders to promote sustainable recycling practices. The website reflects a strong market position as a leader in environmental sustainability and recycling services. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google reCAPTCHA for security, and cookie consent mechanisms ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, providing a professional user experience. From a security perspective, ASEKOL employs standard best practices such as HTTPS and spam protection on forms. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response information indicate areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trustworthiness but the professional presentation and client testimonials mitigate concerns. Overall, ASEKOL presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence aligned with its environmental mission. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving domain registration transparency to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asekol.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASEKOL holds a dominant position in the Czech recycling sector, focusing on electrical appliance waste management. Its non-profit business model finances the entire recycling process and supports manufacturers and importers in meeting legal obligations. The company targets a broad audience including manufacturers, sellers, municipalities, companies, and the general public. ASEKOL's extensive collection network and partnerships with major brands underscore its competitive advantage. The company actively engages in ESG reporting and social responsibility initiatives, enhancing its market reputation and stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforcement and use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam. Cookie consent is managed with granular user controls, supporting privacy compliance. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved with additional security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to increase trust and legitimacy perception.
  5. Maintain and regularly update cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ASEKOL
VAT number
CZ27373231
Registration number
27373231
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASEKOL
Description
ASEKOL is a collective system for the collection and recycling of end-of-life electrical appliances. It operates a nationwide system for the collection, transport, and recycling of used electrical devices, financing the entire process. ASEKOL cooperates with manufacturers, importers, municipalities, sellers, repair shops, and collection companies.
Key services
Collection and recycling of electrical appliances, Logistics and transport, Financing of the recycling process, Client services for manufacturers and sellers, Operating a network of over 17,500 collection points
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA v3, Webflow CMS, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Fonts, CookieConsent.js, Basin form handling
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form spam protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular consent categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via Basin service

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
CookieConsent.js, Basin form service
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on environmental sustainability and recycling.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. Multiple client testimonials from reputable companies.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Webflow).
  8. Multiple contact methods clearly provided.
  9. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. Hosting appears to be via Webflow's CDN infrastructure, ensuring fast content delivery. The site includes responsive design features and accessibility enhancements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Form handling is outsourced to Basin, a third-party service, which manages form submissions securely. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, performant, and well-maintained with minor opportunities for security header improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asekol.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asekol.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.