Skip to main content

Security report for ascrs.org

American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) operates a comprehensive and professionally designed website serving anterior segment surgeons and eye care professionals. The organization provides extensive educational resources, advocacy, and philanthropic initiatives, positioning itself as the largest U.S. membership society in its field. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with integrated tools such as CME activities, clinical education, and practice management resources. Technically, the site leverages modern technologies including ASP.NET, Sitecore CMS, and cloud hosting via Microsoft Azure, supported by robust analytics and marketing integrations. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, bot management, and detailed cookie consent mechanisms, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the site reflects a trustworthy and authoritative entity in the healthcare non-profit sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ascrs.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASCRS holds a dominant market position in the ophthalmology professional society sector, targeting anterior segment surgeons with a membership-based model. Its revenue streams likely include membership dues, CME offerings, conferences, and philanthropic donations. The organization maintains partnerships with related entities such as ASOA and media outlets, enhancing its ecosystem. The website's content and navigation are tailored to professional users, supporting career development and clinical excellence. Growth indicators include ongoing events, digital CME access, and active advocacy programs. The presence of multiple external trusted domains and social media channels supports a broad engagement strategy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive cookie consent compliant with GDPR, and use of Cloudflare for bot management. Security headers are present, and session management is handled securely. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. The site should consider publishing a security.txt file and explicit incident response procedures to enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from improved disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement and expose a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance contact information availability, including official support emails and phone numbers.
  5. Maintain and monitor cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Description
ASCRS is a professional society dedicated to anterior segment surgeons, providing education, advocacy, philanthropy, and career enhancement to improve eye care quality.
Key services
Clinical education, Meetings and conferences, Practice management tools, Advocacy and regulatory updates, Philanthropic initiatives, Continuing Medical Education (CME)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare (bot management), CookieYes (cookie consent management), FundraiseUp (fundraising widget), Coveo Search, ASP.NET
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Bot management via Cloudflare
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of secure cookies (e.g., __Host-stripe.mkt.csrf)
  • Session management cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Sitecore Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Feathr
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
FundraiseUp, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and controls.
  3. Strong use of third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent compliance.
  4. Professional and consistent branding and content quality.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, but no suspicious indicators found.
  7. Multiple external trusted domains linked including official journals and foundations.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including ASP.NET and Sitecore CMS, hosted on Microsoft Azure with Cloudflare providing bot management and CDN services. It integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FundraiseUp for fundraising, and Coveo for search functionality. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the extensive use of external scripts and rich content. Opportunities exist to optimize loading times and streamline third-party dependencies to improve user experience further. The technical infrastructure supports the organization's complex content and membership management needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ascrs.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ascrs.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.