Skip to main content

Security report for asbestos.lv

Asbestos Lab Ltd. · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asbestos Lab Ltd. is a Latvian company specializing in asbestos management and hazardous waste services. Their offerings include asbestos identification, sampling, risk assessment, removal, monitoring, and inventory management, alongside hazardous cargo transportation compliant with ADR conventions. The company positions itself as a responsible contractor with sustainability focus, serving businesses and organizations requiring environmental safety solutions. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies and integrates analytics and social media for outreach. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies and security headers. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which limits domain trust analysis but the website content and business information appear consistent and professional.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asbestos.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention asbestos.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
13
Weak passwords
8%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for asbestos.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy and transportation sectors with a focus on asbestos and hazardous waste management. It targets organizations needing environmental safety compliance and asbestos removal services. The business model is service-oriented with licenses and certifications supporting legitimacy. The website reflects a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and clear contact information. Partnerships include related domain azbests.lv. The company leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for user engagement. Growth indicators include recent projects showcased and multilingual support. Strategic observations suggest enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern security practices such as asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate incident reporting and improve security posture.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear data retention policies to build user trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Asbestos Lab Ltd.
VAT number
LV 44103124199
Registration number
44103124199
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asbestos Lab Ltd.
Description
Asbestos Lab Ltd. provides comprehensive asbestos-related services including identification, sampling, risk assessment, removal, monitoring, and inventory of asbestos-containing materials. They also offer hazardous cargo transportation and environmental solutions.
Key services
Identification of asbestos-containing materials, Sampling and analysis, Risk assessment, Asbestos removal, Monitoring safety compliance, Inventory of asbestos materials, Hazardous cargo transportation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Slick Carousel, Bootstrap 4.19.6
Frameworks
Kallyas WordPress Theme, Zion Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for asbestos management services.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the about-us page.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple communication channels.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 using the Kallyas theme and Zion Builder framework, leveraging jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel for UI components. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and Facebook SDK for social media features. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asbestos.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asbestos.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.