Skip to main content

Security report for asalaser.com

ASAlaser · Healthcare · Italy

Partial score · DNS & email only

65/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASAlaser is an established Italian company specializing in the production of medical devices for laser therapy and magnetotherapy, positioning itself as an international reference in this niche healthcare sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence, targeting medical professionals and patients seeking advanced therapeutic solutions. The business model focuses on manufacturing and sales of specialized medical equipment, with a history dating back to 1983, indicating a mature market presence. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with legacy jQuery and integrates modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, reflecting a commitment to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has implemented cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the content. Overall, the website presents a solid business and technical foundation with room for improvement in security policies, privacy transparency, and domain registration verification. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, updating legacy libraries, and enhancing security headers to strengthen the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asalaser.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
65

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention asalaser.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for asalaser.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASAlaser operates in the healthcare manufacturing sector, focusing on laser therapy and magnetotherapy devices. Its market positioning as an international reference suggests competitive advantages in product quality and innovation. The business model is product-centric, targeting healthcare providers and patients. Revenue streams likely derive from device sales and possibly training or support services. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a stable presence since 1983. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with major platforms like Google and Facebook for marketing and analytics. Growth indicators include multilingual site versions and active content updates. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced digital trust signals and compliance documentation to support expansion and customer confidence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with detailed categories, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Content-Type-Options indicates gaps in defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but the use of an outdated jQuery version could pose risks if exploited. Compliance gaps include missing privacy and terms of service pages, which are critical for legal and regulatory adherence. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of contact channels. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in transparency and proactive communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and disclose a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Upgrade legacy JavaScript libraries, particularly jQuery, to current secure versions.
  4. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ASAlaser
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASAlaser
Description
ASA è punto di riferimento internazionale nella produzione di dispositivi medicali per laserterapia e magnetoterapia
Key services
Production of medical devices for laser therapy, Production of medical devices for magnetotherapy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Uses Drupal 7 CMS with legacy jQuery version
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed cookie categories and granular user control
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status
  6. Contact information clearly provided in structured data
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No data protection officer contact found
  9. Advertising and tracking via Google and Facebook present with transparency
  10. Website content is professional and relevant to healthcare sector
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS, a mature but aging platform, using jQuery 1.10.2, which is outdated and may have security vulnerabilities. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot indicates a modern approach to analytics and privacy management. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and scripts from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The technical debt from legacy CMS and libraries presents modernization opportunities to improve security and maintainability. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the infrastructure supports current business needs but requires updates to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asalaser.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asalaser.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.