Skip to main content

Security report for artoftravel.lv

CG21 · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.conciergegroup.eu represents a small luxury service provider specializing in bespoke travel agency and concierge services under the brand CG21. The business targets affluent travelers seeking personalized travel experiences and concierge support. The website is professionally designed using the Webflow platform and incorporates modern technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. Hosting is provided via Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers or policies are visible in the provided HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which may impact compliance and user trust. No contact information or forms are present, limiting direct user engagement and transparency. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected by EURid, which is common for EU domains and justified for this business type. Overall, the website presents a professional image but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance, and contact transparency to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching artoftravel.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CG21 operates in the hospitality sector focusing on bespoke travel and concierge services, targeting a niche market of luxury travelers. The business model revolves around personalized service offerings rather than mass-market travel solutions. The website's clean design and branding consistency support a premium market position. Absence of detailed company information, contact data, or certifications limits external validation of business credibility. The use of Webflow CMS and integration with Google Tag Manager indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the domain or website content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations, which is critical for EU-based businesses.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields are present in the analyzed content, minimizing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance concern. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical and acceptable for this business type. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies prominently on the website to ensure GDPR compliance and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company email, phone number, and physical address to improve transparency and business credibility.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues arise from external dependencies.
  5. Consider adding a security incident response policy or contact channel to demonstrate preparedness and commitment to security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CG21
Description
Bespoke travel agency and concierge services
Key services
Bespoke travel agency, Concierge service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided on the homepage or metadata.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found on the main page.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. Uses Webflow CMS and hosting with Amazon CloudFront CDN.
  6. Includes Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking.
  7. No explicit security headers or advanced security configurations detected in the HTML content.
  8. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Hosting is via Amazon CloudFront CDN, which supports good availability and performance. The HTML content is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. No advanced frameworks or backend technologies are evident from the provided content. Performance is moderate, with video backgrounds that are hidden by default, possibly to optimize load times. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with artoftravel.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review artoftravel.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.