Skip to main content

Security report for artist.ee

Zone Media OÜ · Media · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Artist.ee is a specialized Estonian marketing and media company operating since 2010 under Zone Media OÜ. The company focuses on retail and service environments, offering services such as marketing, media, audio design, studio production, technical audio solutions, and advertising screens. Their market position is strong within Estonia, targeting retail businesses and brands aiming for effective in-store and service environment communication. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses WordPress CMS with modern libraries and Google Analytics for tracking. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate room for improvement. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching artist.ee

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media and retail sectors, leveraging a service-based business model focused on marketing and audio-visual solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in their specialization in purchase and service environments, with a broad reach covering up to 82% of retail purchases in Estonia. The business targets retail chains, shopping centers, and construction stores, offering quick campaign planning and execution. The partnership ecosystem includes major retail brands visible on the website. Growth indicators include long domain age and established client base. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding digital marketing tools and enhancing compliance to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contacts, which limits transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. The use of Google Analytics indicates moderate user tracking without clear privacy controls. The business should prioritize implementing security headers, privacy policies, and vulnerability disclosure to improve security culture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish security.txt or equivalent to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security best practices.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for support and security incidents.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zone Media OÜ
Description
Eesti ainus ostu- ja teeninduskeskkonnale spetsialiseerunud turunduse, meedia ning arenduse ettevõte. Eesmärk on hoolitseda, et kliendi sõnum oleks viimane, mida inimene kuuleb.
Key services
Turundus ja meedia (Marketing and media), Heli disain (Audio design), Stuudio (Studio production), Helitehnilised lahendused (Technical audio solutions), Reklaami ekraanid (Advertising screens)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Swiper.js, FancyBox, Google Analytics, Google Maps API, Contact Form 7
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information only via contact form; no emails or phone numbers explicitly listed
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries
  5. Good branding consistency and professional design
  6. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements
  7. Google Analytics used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism
  8. WHOIS data consistent and domain age supports business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and uses modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and FancyBox for UI components. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS and nameservers, providing reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. Technical debt is low but the absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with artist.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review artist.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.