Skip to main content

Security report for arteldoc.tv

Privacy protection service - whoisproxy.ru · Media · Russia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RT.DOC is a Russian-based online streaming platform specializing in documentary films and series from around the world. The platform offers free access to high-quality documentary content covering history, culture, science, sports, and politics, targeting a general audience interested in educational and cultural media. It supports multiple languages including Russian, English, and Chinese, enhancing accessibility for a broader user base. The business model centers on free streaming with optional user registration to enable personalized features such as watchlists and ratings. The platform is relatively new, with domain registration in May 2024, indicating a recent market entry.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arteldoc.tv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche position in the media streaming market focusing on documentary content. Its competitive advantage lies in offering free access to curated documentaries without mandatory registration, appealing to users seeking educational content. The multilingual support and PWA capabilities suggest a focus on modern digital delivery and user convenience. Revenue streams are not explicitly detailed but may include advertising or sponsorships given the presence of tracking pixels. The company maintains a privacy-protected WHOIS registration, common in media services, and uses Megafon-based hosting infrastructure. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Security posture

RT.DOC employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforces domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are publicly available, which may impact compliance and trust. The platform uses modern web technologies including service workers and video.js for streaming but lacks visible advanced security controls. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in DNS security and HTTP header hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Add more comprehensive contact information including phone and physical address to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy protection service - whoisproxy.ru
Description
Онлайн кинотеатр документального кино и сериалов со всей планеты! Смотрите фильмы бесплатно в хорошем качестве в любом месте и в любое время. Лучшие работы документалистов по истории и культуре, о путешествиях и науке, а также спорте и политике.
Key services
streaming documentary films and series, user accounts with watchlists and ratings, multilingual support (RU, EN, CN)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Video.js, Service Workers, PWA manifest
Platforms
Progressive Web App
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Mail.ru
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mail.ru, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Russian-language documentary streaming platform with multilingual support
  2. Content is free to watch with optional user registration
  3. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond basic cookie and privacy notices
  4. No visible phone contact or physical address; only email contact info
  5. No advanced security headers or incident response info publicly available
  6. Uses modern web technologies including PWA and video streaming
  7. No WAF or blocking detected
  8. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and recent domain registration
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and video.js for media playback. It supports Progressive Web App features with service worker registration and a manifest file, indicating good mobile optimization and offline capabilities. Hosting appears to be provided by Megafon based on nameservers. Performance is moderate with responsive design and accessibility features present but could be enhanced. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers which could be exploited if unaddressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arteldoc.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arteldoc.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.