Skip to main content

Security report for arteksarhitekti.lv

ARTEKS Arhitekti · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ARTEKS Arhitekti is a specialized architecture studio based in Riga, Latvia, offering a range of services including building project management, BIM projects, certified passive house design, construction expertise, and DGNB certified design. The company targets clients in the Latvian real estate and construction sectors, emphasizing sustainability and functional aesthetics. The website showcases a professional portfolio of projects, reinforcing its market position as a credible and experienced architecture firm. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and jQuery, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced compliance and protection. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and business presentation appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital presence with room for security and privacy improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arteksarhitekti.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on architectural design and project management services. Its competitive advantage lies in certified sustainable design offerings such as DGNB and passive house certifications, appealing to environmentally conscious clients. The business model is service-oriented, targeting residential and commercial construction projects primarily in Riga and surrounding areas. The website's portfolio highlights diverse projects including residential homes, office buildings, and renovations, indicating a broad client base. Partnerships with design and sustainability certification bodies enhance credibility. Growth potential is supported by the increasing demand for sustainable architecture. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and social media engagement via Facebook. However, the lack of detailed company registration and contact information online may limit trust for new clients.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML source. The absence of a cookie consent banner and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms suggests partial GDPR adherence. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security management. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and public security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to demonstrate commitment to security and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to provide a clear channel for vulnerability disclosure and incident communication.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data availability or domain registration transparency to improve trustworthiness and legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ARTEKS Arhitekti
Description
Arhitektūras studija Rīgā, piedāvā būvprojektu un projektu vadību, BIM projektus, pasīvo māju sertificētu projektēšanu, būvekspertīzi un DGNB sertificētu projektēšanu.
Key services
Būvprojekti un projektu vadība, BIM projekti, Pasīvās mājas sertificēta projektēšana, Būvekspertīze, DGNB sertificēta projektēšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Fonts (Inter), YouTube embed, WebFont Loader
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and portfolio.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found, but privacy policy page exists.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  5. Uses modern Webflow platform and Google Fonts.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook linked.
  8. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML source.
  9. Phone number found in footer with label 'piezvanīt' (call).
  10. No forms detected in provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosting, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Fonts (Inter). The site loads resources from Webflow's CDN and Google domains, ensuring reliable performance. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO meta tags including description and viewport settings. The site uses embedded YouTube videos for multimedia content. No analytics or third-party tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but includes basic focus-visible outlines for keyboard navigation. Performance is moderate, with optimized images and lazy loading used. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, suitable for a small architecture firm’s online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arteksarhitekti.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arteksarhitekti.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.