Security report for arporntube.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ARPornTube.com is a specialized media blog focused on augmented reality pornography, providing news, updates, and information about AR porn studios, apps, and videos. The site positions itself as a leading source for AR porn content and industry developments, targeting adult consumers interested in immersive AR adult entertainment. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Yoast SEO and Flowplayer, and uses Google Analytics for tracking. The website is well-designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, though it lacks formal privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing or inconsistent, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional site presentation. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but would benefit from improved compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view: 35/ 100 · High
Checks completed: 7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
(b) Incident handling: One indicator
(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- High
  No Privacy Policy found
  GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
  What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
  References
  - GDPR Art. 12
  - GDPR Art. 13
  - NIST PT-5: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-5: Privacy Notice
- High
  No Cookie Policy found
  GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
  What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
  References
  - ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
- High
  No Cookie Consent Banner found
  GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
  What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
  References
  - GDPR Art. 7
  - ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
  - NIST PT-4: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-4: Consent
- High
  Third-party services without privacy policy
  Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, Google APIs
  What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
  References
  - GDPR Art. 13(1)(e)
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
  Weak Protocols Supported
  Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
  What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
  References
  - CWE-327
  - OWASP A04:2025
  - ASVS V12.1.1
  - RFC 8996
  - RFC 7568
  - Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
  - NIS2 21(2)(h)
  - IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
  - NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
Network security
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
- High
  High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
  Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
  What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
  References
  - NIS2 21(2)(e)
  - IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
  - NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
  - NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arporntube.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS: 72
Security headers: 80
Email security: 70
DNS health: 75
Network security: 20
GDPR outside view: 35
Average: 59

Not counted

NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates in the niche AR adult entertainment media sector, serving a growing market of AR porn consumers. It leverages affiliate partnerships with major AR/VR porn studios such as VRPorn.com, VRBangers, and Sex Like Real to provide content and drive traffic. The business model is primarily content publishing with potential affiliate revenue streams. The site demonstrates consistent branding and content updates, indicating active management. However, the lack of clear company registration and domain registration transparency may impact trust. The partnership ecosystem is strong within the AR porn industry, positioning the site as a key information hub. Growth indicators include frequent new posts and coverage of emerging AR porn technologies and studios.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no cookie consent mechanism. The absence of WHOIS transparency and domain registration inconsistencies further reduce trust. Overall, the site is functional but should enhance its security and compliance posture to reduce risk and improve user trust.

Recommendations

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and implement a cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Create and publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
Verify and update domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy, reducing suspicion from missing WHOIS data.
Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain a secure environment.

Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description: ARPornTube.com is a blog and news site focused on augmented reality (AR) pornography, providing latest releases, news, apps, games, studios, and updates related to AR adult content.
Key services: News and updates on AR porn, Reviews and information on AR porn apps and games, Links to studios and content providers
Content quality: good
Branding: consistent

Technology

Stack: WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Flowplayer Video Player plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Lazy loading scripts
Frameworks: WordPress
Platforms: Web
Performance: moderate
Mobile: good
Accessibility: basic
SEO: good

Security

Observed score

75/100

Good practices seen

HTTPS enforced
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Use of Google site verification

Analytics and tracking

Services: Google Analytics
Tracking level: moderate
Privacy practices: poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels: Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency: basic

Site quality

Design: good
User experience: good
Content relevance: good
Navigation: good
Professionalism: good
Trustworthiness: moderate

Key observations

Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Content is focused on AR porn news, apps, and studios with regularly updated blog posts.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
Contact email arporntube@gmail.com is provided in footer but no phone or physical address found.
Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics for tracking.
WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is suspicious given site content age.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
No explicit GDPR compliance or cookie consent mechanism detected.
Site design and navigation are good with SEO optimizations via Yoast plugin.
No social media links found except external links to Reddit and Twitter accounts.

Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using up-to-date plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Flowplayer for video playback. It employs jQuery and lazy loading techniques to improve performance and user experience. Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager are integrated for styling and analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements possible through enhanced caching and security header implementation. The technical stack is standard for content publishing sites but lacks advanced security configurations and formal compliance mechanisms.

Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.