Skip to main content

Security report for architect-plus.cz

Premium Media Group · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ARCHITECT+ is a leading Czech and Slovak architecture magazine published by Premium Media Group. The website serves as a digital platform for the magazine, offering current issues, archives, subscription options, and news related to architecture and design. The company targets architects, designers, construction professionals, students, and influential individuals in the Czech and Slovak markets. The business model revolves around media publication, advertising, and event partnerships. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern plugin ecosystem including Yoast SEO, Revolution Slider, Elementor, and social media integrations. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled, though security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent implemented but no clear privacy policy page found in the provided content. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though WHOIS data is privacy protected and not publicly available.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching architect-plus.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a prestigious architecture magazine in the Czech Republic. It leverages a unique distribution list targeting top architects and influential persons. Revenue streams include magazine sales (print and digital), subscriptions, and advertising partnerships. The website supports growth through newsletter subscriptions and social media engagement. Partnerships with subscription services like send.cz enhance customer reach. The company operates in the media sector with a focus on architecture and design content. The brand is consistent and well-recognized in its niche.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, which could be improved. The use of WordPress and popular plugins suggests regular updates but also necessitates vigilant patch management to avoid vulnerabilities. Forms are present but no detailed analysis of input validation or anti-spam measures was possible. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were identified. The site lacks a visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be enhanced for better transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  3. Add explicit contact emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance GDPR compliance by providing detailed cookie and data processing information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Premium Media Group
Description
Revue pro prezentaci české a slovenské architektury.
Key services
Magazine publication, Online content, Newsletter, Advertising and event partnerships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Revolution Slider, jQuery, Elementor, GoodLayers Core, Contact Form 7, Instagram Feed plugin, OneSignal Push Notifications, AdRotate
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRotate
Tracking pixels
OneSignal
Marketing tools
OneSignal Push Notifications
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional architecture magazine site with rich content and good design.
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, likely privacy protected.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, sliders, forms, and social media integration.
  4. Has cookie consent mechanism and GDPR compliance indicators.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is prominent.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. No signs of malware or phishing.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. No visible privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the content provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a suite of well-known plugins for SEO, sliders, forms, and social media feeds. It uses jQuery and Elementor for frontend interactivity and layout. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and social media platforms. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive design. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not available. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided data. The site uses OneSignal for push notifications and AdRotate for advertising management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with architect-plus.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review architect-plus.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.