Skip to main content

Security report for archidesignclub.com

Muuuz · Media · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Muuuz is a leading French online media platform dedicated to architecture, design, and related arts, established in 2008 and operated under Groupe Ficade. It serves a professional and enthusiast audience with news, inspiration, event coverage, and multimedia content. The website is built on Joomla! CMS with modern web technologies and integrates multiple third-party services for analytics and advertising. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the site’s professional presentation and active content mitigate concerns. Overall, Muuuz presents a credible and authoritative presence in its niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching archidesignclub.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Muuuz holds a strong market position as the foremost French web magazine in architecture and design, targeting architects, designers, and enthusiasts. Its business model revolves around content publication, community engagement, and event promotion (notably the MIAW awards). Revenue likely derives from advertising and sponsored content. The company maintains active social media channels and partnerships, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include regular content updates and multimedia expansion. The lack of transparent WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from its market credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates standard analytics and advertising scripts. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to enhance security. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is basic, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which could pose compliance risks under GDPR. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish security and incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Muuuz
Description
Muuuz est aujourd'hui la plus importante communauté française d'architectes. Créé en 2008, Muuuz.com est le premier web Magazine français du secteur du design et de l'architecture.
Key services
Architecture news and articles, Design trends and inspiration, Event coverage (MIAW awards), Newsletter subscriptions, Video content (Muuuz TV)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla! 3.10.12, Bootstrap 3, jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Swiper, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Pinterest Widgets, Twitter Widgets
Frameworks
Joomla! CMS, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by base href https://www.muuuz.com/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, analytics.ficade.fr
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
OpenX Mediamatis
Tracking pixels
Pinterest, Twitter
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional French architecture and design media platform
  2. Content is rich and updated with recent articles dated July 2025
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found on main page
  4. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked
  5. Use of multiple third-party scripts and ad networks
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, reducing transparency
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla! 3.10.12 with Bootstrap 3 and uses jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, and Swiper for UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Pinterest, and Twitter widgets for analytics and social media. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and has good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The absence of security headers and explicit privacy mechanisms are technical gaps. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with archidesignclub.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review archidesignclub.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.