Skip to main content

Security report for arageek.com

أراجيك · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

أراجيك is a prominent Arabic youth magazine targeting millennials interested in technology, arts, science, and reading. The website positions itself as a leading media outlet in the Arabic-speaking youth segment, offering diverse content including articles, videos, and encyclopedic knowledge. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and Chakra UI, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and ConvertBox. The website demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, though performance is moderate. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but the absence of security headers and lack of visible privacy or cookie policies indicate room for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance and active content. Overall, the site is functional and credible but should enhance privacy compliance and security posture to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arageek.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a media platform focused on technology and culture for Arabic-speaking millennials. Its business model likely revolves around content publishing, advertising, and possibly sponsored content or partnerships. The presence of multiple social media channels indicates a broad digital marketing strategy. The lack of explicit business registration or contact details limits transparency but the brand is well established in its niche. Growth indicators include active content updates and diversified content formats. The site does not reveal parent or subsidiary relationships. Strategic observations suggest focusing on improving compliance and security to maintain competitive advantage and user trust.

Security posture

The current security posture shows basic maturity with HTTPS enabled and no immediate vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may hinder rapid response to security events. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Izooto introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. The missing WHOIS data is a red flag for domain legitimacy and could be exploited by attackers for phishing or impersonation. Overall, the site should implement stronger security headers, publish security policies, and clarify domain registration details to improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and marketing tools to minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
أراجيك
Description
اراجيك AraGeek مجلةٌ شبابيةٌ موجهةٌ إلى شباب جيلِ الألفية، وهي اختصارٌ للعبارة الإنجليزية: Arab Geek، أو الشخصِ المهووسِ بالتقنية والفنون والعلوم والقراءة.
Key services
مقالات مطولة, محتوى تقني, محتوى ثقافي, محتوى فني, موسوعة, شاهد (محتوى فيديو)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Analytics, Chakra UI, Google Fonts, ConvertBox
Frameworks
Next.js, Chakra UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Izooto
Marketing tools
ConvertBox, Izooto
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual for an active .com domain.
  3. Website is a professional Arabic youth magazine focused on technology, culture, and science.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  6. Social media links are present in structured data (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, YouTube, Wikipedia).
  7. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. Includes Google Analytics and marketing tools like ConvertBox and Izooto.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is used.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based framework (Next.js) combined with Chakra UI for UI components, ensuring responsive and accessible design. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site loads asynchronously and uses image optimization techniques. However, no CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not evident. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and script management. Accessibility features are well implemented, and SEO metadata is comprehensive. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts without visible security controls and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arageek.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arageek.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.