Skip to main content

Security report for aptiekasf.lv

A/S Sentor Farm Aptiekas · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A/S Sentor Farm Aptiekas is a Latvian pharmaceutical wholesale distributor specializing in supplying medicines to pharmacies and other authorized legal entities. The website clearly targets professional customers in the healthcare sector, providing wholesale pricing information and contact details. The company presents itself with a consistent brand and provides essential business information including registration number and physical address in Riga, Latvia. The digital presence is built on Bitrix CMS with integration of Google Maps for location display and uses Google Fonts for typography. The website includes a cookie consent mechanism with a linked cookie policy PDF, indicating some level of privacy compliance awareness. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, and integrates Google Analytics conditionally based on user consent. However, there is no visible privacy policy or terms of service page, which is a compliance gap. Security headers are not evident in the HTML content, and WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, and no explicit vulnerabilities or adult content were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency. The business credibility is supported by clear contact information and professional presentation, but the lack of WHOIS data and privacy policy reduces trust slightly. Strategic recommendations include implementing a comprehensive privacy policy, adding security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving accessibility features to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aptiekasf.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aptiekasf.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aptiekasf.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare wholesale sector in Latvia, focusing on pharmaceutical distribution. Its business model revolves around supplying medicines in bulk to pharmacies and legal entities, indicating a B2B focus. The presence of a company registration number and physical address supports legitimacy. The website content and structure suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position in Latvia. The lack of social media presence or additional digital marketing channels may limit broader market reach. The use of Bitrix CMS and Google Maps integration indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. The company appears to prioritize compliance with cookie regulations but lacks full privacy and terms disclosures. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. Overall, the company maintains a professional but basic online presence aligned with its wholesale business focus.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS as indicated by external Google APIs and scripts, but explicit SSL configuration details are not available. Security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are not detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, and Google Analytics is loaded conditionally based on user consent, showing some privacy awareness. No forms with sensitive input fields were detected, reducing risk exposure. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
A/S Sentor Farm Aptiekas
Registration number
55403012521
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A/S Sentor Farm Aptiekas
Description
Zāļu lieltirgotava (Wholesale pharmaceutical distributor)
Key services
Wholesale distribution of medicines
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, Bitrix CMS, Roboto and Google Sans fonts, JavaScript, CSS
Platforms
Bitrix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Bitrix CMS and Google Maps integration.
  2. Contact information is clearly presented including company registration number, address, phone, and email.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with a link to a cookie policy PDF.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. Google Analytics is conditionally loaded based on cookie consent.
  8. No social media links detected.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Bitrix CMS platform, utilizing Google Fonts and Google Maps API for enhanced user experience. JavaScript and CSS are used for UI components including a cookie consent banner. The site loads Google Analytics conditionally based on cookie consent, indicating some privacy-aware design. Performance appears moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, there is a lack of advanced SEO meta tags and structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. No forms with data collection fields were found, limiting data exposure risks. The absence of security headers and privacy documentation indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aptiekasf.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aptiekasf.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.