Skip to main content

Security report for aptek.ee

APTEK · Hospitality · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

APTEK is a small hospitality business operating as a cocktail and shot bar located in Pärnu, Estonia. The website presents a well-structured digital presence with event promotions, a cocktail menu, and club membership offerings targeting adults interested in nightlife. The business appears established with a domain age of over 12 years, consistent WHOIS data, and active social media engagement. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Owl Carousel, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, and the contact form is disabled, which limits user interaction and compliance with data protection regulations. Security headers are not evident, and while HTTPS is used, further security hardening is recommended. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aptek.ee

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets the nightlife and hospitality sector in Pärnu, Estonia, focusing on cocktail and shot offerings with event hosting and club membership benefits. The business model relies on in-person sales, events, and membership incentives. The website supports marketing through social media and Google Analytics tracking, indicating moderate digital maturity. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests gaps in regulatory compliance. The domain registration is consistent with the business location and age, supporting legitimacy. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data. The business appears to maintain a local market position with a focus on customer experience and event-driven engagement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The contact form is commented out, reducing the risk of form abuse but also limiting user communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap is standard but requires regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not present, suggesting limited formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Activate and secure the contact form with proper validation and anti-spam measures.
  3. Add and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish and communicate an incident response process and security policy to enhance trust and preparedness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
APTEK
Description
Cocktail and shot bar located in Pärnu, Estonia offering classic and signature cocktails, shots, events, and club membership benefits.
Key services
Cocktail bar, Shot menu, Event hosting, Club membership with discounts and free entry
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a cocktail and shot bar in Pärnu, Estonia with event promotions and club membership.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact form is present but commented out, limiting direct user interaction.
  4. Social media presence is strong with Facebook and Instagram links.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates user tracking but no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS usage assumed but not confirmed by headers.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well aged, supporting legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard front-end technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and Google Fonts. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking user behavior. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. The hosting provider is likely Telia Eesti AS, consistent with the domain registrar information. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization techniques detected. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with meta description and keywords present but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears to be a custom or static site. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and privacy compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aptek.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aptek.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.