Skip to main content

Security report for apsgrupe.lt

UAB "APS grupė" · Energy · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB "APS grupė" is a Lithuanian engineering company specializing in electrical infrastructure installation, maintenance, and design services. Established in 2011, it serves a broad range of clients with services including indoor and outdoor electrical networks, security and fire alarm systems, video surveillance, access control, automation, telecommunications, and general contracting. The company holds multiple ISO certifications (9001, 14001, 45001) reflecting its commitment to quality, environmental management, and occupational health and safety. The website presents a professional image with detailed project portfolios, team contacts, and client logos, positioning the company as a reputable medium-sized player in the Lithuanian energy and engineering sector. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with good mobile responsiveness and user experience. However, it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No forms or analytics scripts were detected, indicating minimal user data collection and tracking. The domain is well-established since 2011, consistent with the company's history, and no suspicious WHOIS patterns were found. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but missing explicit security headers and incident response information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, adding security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing accessibility features to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apsgrupe.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UAB "APS grupė" operates in the energy and engineering sector in Lithuania, focusing on electrical infrastructure and security systems. Its competitive advantage lies in its ISO certifications, experienced workforce, and broad service portfolio covering design, installation, and maintenance. The company targets business clients requiring complex engineering solutions, emphasizing quality and innovation. Revenue streams likely come from project contracts, equipment rental, and general contracting services. The website showcases a solid partnership ecosystem with client logos and a professional team, indicating stable market presence and growth potential. However, the lack of explicit privacy and security disclosures may limit appeal to privacy-conscious clients or international partners.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy, which reduces transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected, and no forms collect user data, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and incident response readiness to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish incident response contact information and establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to prevent vulnerabilities and maintain a secure technology stack.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB "APS grupė"
VAT number
LT100005360013
Registration number
302498905
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB "APS grupė"
Description
UAB "APS grupė" is a Lithuanian company specializing in installation, maintenance, and design of electrical and engineering infrastructure systems including indoor and outdoor electrical networks, security and fire alarm systems, video surveillance, sound systems, access control, automation, telecommunications, general contracting, trenchless technology installation, and equipment rental. The company emphasizes professionalism, quality, and innovation in engineering solutions.
Key services
Indoor electrical networks, Outdoor electrical networks up to 35 kV, Security alarm systems, Fire alarm systems, Video surveillance systems, Sound systems, Access control systems, Automation and process control systems, Telecommunications systems, General contracting
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, jQuery, SmartPhoto.js, Magnific Popup
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS assumed (URL uses https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented
  4. Security policies and certifications are documented and linked
  5. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information provided
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking
  7. Website uses modern frontend technologies but lacks some security headers
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook with no LinkedIn or Instagram URLs provided
  9. No forms detected that collect user data
  10. Company appears legitimate and established with clear business focus
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap framework, and jQuery library, supplemented by SmartPhoto.js and Magnific Popup for image viewing and modals. The site is mobile responsive with a clear navigation structure and good content organization. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected but could benefit from optimization. No CMS or backend platform was identified, suggesting a static or custom-built site. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features, which could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal data collection. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with modern security and SEO best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apsgrupe.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apsgrupe.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.