Skip to main content

Security report for aprupe.group

SIA Aprūpes Grupa · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Aprūpes Grupa operates as a family-type elder care provider in Riga, Latvia, offering comprehensive 24/7 care services including specialized support for clients with dementia and bedridden conditions. The company runs two facilities, Gobas Apartamenti and Lastādija, focusing on providing a homely environment and quality life for seniors. Their market position is localized with a clear target audience of seniors and their families seeking professional elder care. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with Yootheme and UIkit frameworks, integrating modern features like Google reCAPTCHA and Facebook SDK for social engagement. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and contact options. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is good with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the business credibility is high with transparent contact information and consistent branding.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of aprupe.group. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aprupe.group

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aprupe.group, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
25%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for aprupe.group.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the elder care sector in Latvia, providing essential healthcare and social rehabilitation services. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on personalized care in a family-like setting. The presence of two facilities indicates modest growth and local market penetration. The website content and social media presence support their community engagement and trust-building efforts. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company appears to be small-sized, founded in 2019, with a clear focus on quality elder care rather than expansion or diversification.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and Google reCAPTCHA protects the contact form against spam. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but could benefit from implementing recommended best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all extensions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and discoverability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Aprūpes Grupa
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Aprūpes Grupa
Description
SIA Aprūpes Grupa is a family-type home for seniors offering full service, 24/7 care, including for bedridden clients and those with Alzheimer's and other dementias. They operate two facilities in Riga: Gobas Apartamenti and Lastādija social care center.
Key services
Elderly care, Social rehabilitation, Medical care, Daily support, Safe environment, Leisure activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Yootheme theme, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
UIkit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for elder care services.
  2. Uses Joomla CMS with Yootheme and UIkit framework.
  3. Includes GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with consent banner.
  4. Contact form secured with Google reCAPTCHA v2.
  5. No visible security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook integrated.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with Yootheme and UIkit frameworks, supported by jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for form security. Facebook SDK is integrated for social media functionality. The site is mobile responsive and loads media-rich content including video backgrounds. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred JavaScript improving load times. However, no advanced performance optimization techniques like CDN usage or caching headers were explicitly detected. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security configuration. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but has room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aprupe.group. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aprupe.group.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.