Skip to main content

Security report for apotti.fi

Oy Apotti Ab · Healthcare · Finland

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oy Apotti Ab operates a specialized social and healthcare information system platform in Finland, integrating social and healthcare data into a unified system. The company targets healthcare professionals and organizations, positioning itself as an important regional player in Finnish healthcare IT. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear focus on its healthcare sector services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Matomo, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, with moderate user tracking balanced by GDPR-compliant consent management. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy, terms of service, and incident response information suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 64 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

  5. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching apotti.fi

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention apotti.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for apotti.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Apotti's market positioning is focused on the Finnish healthcare sector, providing integrated IT solutions for social and healthcare data management. The business model revolves around software and service provision to healthcare entities, with key services including data integration and operational management systems. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and marketing service providers but maintains direct control over its domain registration and branding. Growth indicators include the use of advanced analytics tools and consent management, reflecting a commitment to data-driven operations and regulatory compliance. The website's content and structured data reinforce the company's legitimacy and sector focus, though explicit contact and policy disclosures are limited.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and the use of a reputable cookie consent platform (Cookiebot) to manage user privacy preferences. Analytics tools are deployed with consent, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies represent compliance gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could improve transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced documentation and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the website.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy documents to improve transparency.
  3. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oy Apotti Ab
Description
Apotti on sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon tietojärjestelmä, joka yhdistää sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon tiedot yhteen ja samaan järjestelmään.
Key services
Social and healthcare information system integration, Data management for social and healthcare sectors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Matomo Analytics, Hotjar, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Hotjar, Google Analytics (implied via Google cookies)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Matomo
Marketing tools
ReachMee, Ontame.io, Spotify, YouTube
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented using Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with consent management.
  6. Website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO, indicating standard CMS usage.
  7. Content is focused on healthcare IT solutions in Finland.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard and widely supported platform. It uses jQuery and modern analytics tools including Matomo and Hotjar, integrated with Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and Spotify CDN. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. There is room for improvement in technical SEO and accessibility compliance. No hosting provider details were explicitly found. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apotti.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apotti.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.